Allahabad Court November 1923 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
East Indian Railway Company Vs. Sri Ram Mahadeo
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-13-1923
Reported in: 79Ind.Cas.341
Sulaiman, J.1. This is an application in revision arising out of a Small Cause Court matter. The plaintiff was the consignee of 126 bags, which were loaded at Kidderpur station, and were despatched to Cawnpore. The waggon admittedly arrived at Cawnpore on the 27th of December 1921 and the seals on the waggon were found intact. As the Railway Company had many other waggons to unload, this waggon was put on a siding and remained there for two days. On the 29th of December it was reported that the seals on one side of the waggon were broken. When the contents were checked it was discovered that six bags were missing. After a lengthy correspondence, which came to nothing, the plaintiff instituted the present suit to recover damages for the loss of the bags.2. The Railway Company took several pleas in defence, but three main issues were framed by the Trial Court. The first was whether the Risk Note absolved the defendant Company of all liability or not. The second was whether the goods were...
In Re: Dwarka Prasad Mithal, Vakil
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-12-1923
Reported in: AIR1924All253; (1924)ILR46All121
Grimwood Mears, Kt., C.J., Walsh and Sulaiman, JJ.1. In this case Dwarka Prasad Mithal, an L.L.B. and a duly qualified member of the legal profession, practising as a pleader in the district of Muzaffarnagar, appears before us to answer to a notice which was issued by a member of this Court, in consequence of a complaint made by the District Magistrate of certain conduct which took place before him. It appears from the admission made by Dwarka Prasad himself before us that he was employed, together with two leaders, Mr. Moore, a Barrister, who-was a visitor from Meerut, and Mr. Ramji Lal, a local practitioner of Muzaffarnagar, to represent certain accused in a charge before Mr. Darling, the District Magistrate in whom Dwarka Prasad has assured us he had complete confidence. Curiously enough, on the first day of the proceedings, in the presence of and with the assent silently given of Dwarka Prasad, Mr. Moore went out of his way publicly to assure Mr. Darling of the confidence which the...
Tarsu Beg Vs. Muhammad Yar Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-12-1923
Reported in: 81Ind.Cas.176
Stuart, J.1. Criminal Revisions Nos. 526 and 527 have been put together and have been argued together but they involve absolutely distinct matters which must be carefully separated. What occurred was this. Muhammad Yar Khan and others, tenants of the village of Mahson in the Basti District, instituted a complaint against Tarsu Beg, Rustam Bari and others on the allegations that Tarsu Beg and Rustam Bari, who are servants of the Raja of Basti, attacked their village on a certain day and committed dacoity and arson. Tarsu Beg put in a cross-complaint under two heads. In the first place he stated that he had been assaulted and wrongfully confined by the complainants in the dacoity and arson case, and, secondly, he sought to prosecute the complainants in the dacoity and arson case for lodging a false complaint against him. Rustam Bari put in a cross-complaint in which he charged the complainants in the dacoity case with having illegally seized cattle belonging to the Raja, and added in the...
In Re: Babu Dwarka Prasad Mithal, Vakil
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-12-1923
Reported in: 81Ind.Cas.177
1. In this case Dwarka Prasad Mithal, an LL.B., and a duly qualified member of the legal profession, practising as a Pleader in the District of Muzaffarnagar, appears before us to answer to a notice which was issued by a member of this Court, in consequence of complaint made by the District Magistrate of certain conduct which took place before him. It appears from the admission made by Dwarka Prasad himself before us that he was employed, together with two leaders, Mr. Moore, a Barrister, who was a visitor from Meerut, and Mr. Ramji Lal, a local practitioner of Muaaffarnagar, to represent certain accused in a charge before Mr. Darling, the District Magistrate, in whom Dwarka Prasad has assured us he had complete confidence. Curiously enough, on the first day of the proceedings in the presence of, and with the assent silently given of, Dwarka Prasad, Mr. Moore went out of his way publicly to assure Mr. Darling of the confidence which they all had in him as a Tribunal, and assured him th...
Thakur Mahipal Singh Vs. Athal Singh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1923
Reported in: AIR1925All5
Sulaiman, J.1. This appeal arises out of certain execution proceedings. Mahipal Singh brought a suit for a simple money decree against Raghunandan which was decreed sometime ago. An appeal was presented to the District Judge, and was dismissed. While a second appeal was pending in this Court the decree was put in execution and the judgment-debtor was arrested and brought to the Court of first instance. On his behalf an application has been made that the proceedings should be stay-ad inasmuch as a second appeal was pending in the High Court. The learned Munsiff passed an order that the judgment-debtor should be released provided he deposited in Court a security bond for Rs. 800 as well as furnished sureties for the same. On the 8th April 1921 a security bond signed by two persons Hardeo Singh and Athal Singh was presented which was accepted as sufficient by the Court and the judgment-debtor was released.2. The second appeal was ultimately dismissed on the 23rd June 1921, and after its d...
Ganeshi Lal and ors. Vs. Ganga Prasad and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1923
Reported in: (1924)ILR46All119
Piggott and Stuart, JJ.1. This appeal was filed by Ganga Prasad and Ram Ratan, defendants in the original suit. There were other defendants in the original suit but the decreewas passed against Ganga Prasad and Ram Ratan alone. While the0 appeal was pending, Ganga Prasad died. His representatives are on the record. Later on Ram Ratan died. His representatives have not been brought on the record, and under the law they cannot be brought on now. The appeal must, therefore, be taken to have abated as far as Ram Ratan is concerned. It has been argued on behalf of the representatives of Ganga Prasad.2. The facts may be stated very briefly. A decree was obtained by the plaintiffs respondents against Ganga Prasad, Ram Ratan and others in the court of the Additional Judge of Dholpur on the 30th of April, 1913. The decree was for a sum of money. A portion of this amount was realized by execution of the decree, and the plaintiffs instituted the suit out of which this appeal has arisen to recover...
Ganga Prasad and anr. Vs. Ganesh Lal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1923
Reported in: 79Ind.Cas.332
1. This appeal was filed by Ganga Prasad and Bam Rattan, defendants in the original suit. There were other defendants in the original suit but the decree was passed against Ganga Prasad and Earn Rattan alone. While the appeal was pending, Ganga Prasad died. His representatives are on the record. Later on, Ram Rattan died. His representatives have not been brought on the record, and under the law they cannot be brought on now. The appeal must, therefore, be taken to have abated as far as Ram Rattan is concerned. It has been argued on behalf of the representatives of Ganga Prasad.2. The facts may be stated very briefly. A decree was obtained by the plaintiffs-respondents against Ganga Prasad, Ram Rattan and others in the Court of the Additional Judge of Dholpur on the 30th of April 1913. The decree was for a sum of money. A portion of this amount was realised by execution of the decree, and the plaintiffs instituted the suit out of which this appeal has arisen to recover the balance upon...
Mirza Abdullah Beg and anr. Vs. Ramzan Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-06-1923
Reported in: AIR1924All173; 79Ind.Cas.381
Sulaiman, J.1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal arising out of a suit for possession and arrears of rent. The suit was originally decreed on the 3rd September 1920 against defendants Nos. 1, 5. On the 25th October 1920 defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 only appealed to the lower Appellate Court. The proceedings had been ex parte against defendants Nos. 4 and 5 and they preferred an appeal; they, were, however, made pro forma respondents in the appeal. While the appeal preferred on behalf of defendants Nos. 1, 3, to which defendants Nos. 4 and 5 were parties, was pending an application was presented in the original Court on behalf of defendants Nos. 4 and 5 on the 30th October 1920 for setting aside the ex parte decree. Certain objections were filed by the plaintiffs on the 15th November 1920, but in these objections no plea was taken that the Trial Court had no jurisdiction to set aside the decree on the ground that an appeal was already pending. On the 7th May 1921 the Court of first instance, a...
Bhola Nath and anr. Vs. Ghasi Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-05-1923
Reported in: (1924)ILR46All115
Lindsay and Kanhaiya Lal, JJ.1. This is an appeal from a suit brought for redemption by the plaintiffs respondents.2. The appellants here are the defendants mortgagees.3. In addition to the appeal, we have also before us cross objections put forward against the decree of the court below by the plaintiffs respondents.4. It is no necessary to set out the facts of the case in any great detail. The dispute between the parties here is with regard to certain items of the mortgage account. The defendants mortgagees complain that certain items ought to have been allowed to them by the court below. In turn the plaintiffs mortgagors complain that the lower court has not given them credit for certain items to which they were entitled.5. To deal first with the appeal of the defendants appellants, the mortgagees.6. One claim, which was made in the suit for redemption, was that these mortgagees had during the continuance of the mortgage cut a large number of trees the value of which was assessed at ...
Ghasi Ram and ors. Vs. Pandit Bhola Nath and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-05-1923
Reported in: AIR1924All153; 79Ind.Cas.314
1. This is an appeal from a suit brought for redemption by the plaintiffs-respondents.2. The appellants here are the defendants mortgagees.3. In addition to the appeal we have also before us cross-objections put forward against the decree of the Court below by the plaintiffs-respondents.4. It is not necessary to set out the facts of the case in any great detail. The dispute between the parties here is with regard to certain items of the mortgage account. The defendants-mortgagees complain that certain items ought to have been allowed to them by the Court below. In turn, the plaintiffs mortgagors complain that the lower Court has not given them credit for certain items to which they were entitled.4. To deal first with the appeal of the defendants-appellants, the mortgagees.5. One claim which was made in the suit for redemption was that these mortgagees had, during the continuance of the mortgage, out a large number of trees the value of which was assessed at Rs 3,000.6. The plaintiffs, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›