Allahabad Court November 1922 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Prasad Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1922
Reported in: 71Ind.Cas.505
1. Ram Prasad has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge of Cawnpore on three separate charges of dacoity under Section 395 of the Indian penal Code and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment, the sentences to run concurrently, He appeals. The Local Government has applied that the sentence should be enhanced.2. On the facts, a gang of dacoits assembled on the highway between Khajua, and Jahanabad, on the 24th April 1922. Two ekkas passed carrying passengers; the passengers were robbed and maltreated; after another interval, a cart passed carrying passengers; these passengers were robbed and maltreated. Now, it is perfectly clear to us, upon the evidence, that the same gang of dacoits was present during the whole time and that a dacoity was committed in each instance. It is not material whether all the members of the gang took an active part in each dacoity. It is not material if as many as five of them took an active part in any one dacoity They were there. Some of the...
Udit NaraIn Singh Vs. Randhir Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1922
Reported in: AIR1923All58; 69Ind.Cas.971
1. The plaintiff in this case, Diwan Randhir Singh, is a landed proprietor, resident in the Jhanai District. Amongst his property we find certain land in a village sailed Kerokhar, held by him in what is described in this record as an ubari tenure. We should have preferred to find on the record a little more evidence regarding the precise nature of this tenure and the conditions to which it is subject. It would seem, however, that the tenure is something of the nature of a special grant from Government and that it is subject to resumption by Government under possible conditions, though what those conditions may be is not made particularly clear. As long ago as the 9th of March 1901 Diwan Randhir Singh borrowed a sum of Rs. 5,500, from a caste-fellow of his own, Diwan Balbhadar Singh, residing in the Hamirpur District. One of the few points on which the plaintiff has not, in the course of this litigation, contradicted previous admissions of his Own, is the fact that he really did borrow...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›