Allahabad Court January 1918 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Debi Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-04-1918
Reported in: AIR1918All265; 44Ind.Cas.113
Piggott, J.1. I take what seem to me the essential facts of this case from the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge. The applicant Debi, being at the time a peon in the service of the Court of Wards, had a quarrel with a youth of the name of Shiam Deo, brother of one Suraj Bali, zilladar in the service of the Court of Wards. The quarrel resulted in a souffle and came to the notice of Mrs. Thomas, wife of the Special Manager locally employed by the Court of Wards. She interposed to stop the scuffle and later on Suraj Bali appears to have complained to the Special Manager, Mr. Thomas. Under these circumstances Debi addressed to the Collector, the officer in charge of the Court of Wards, a petition in which he requested to be allowed to resign his employment. In that petition he embodied his own version of his affray with Suraj Bali's brother; and I have no doubt that in so doing he departed from the truth and made statements defamatory to Mrs. Thomas. The Collector seems to have felt i...
Sukha Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-02-1918
Reported in: AIR1918All97(2); 43Ind.Cas.827
1. Sukha has been convicted under Section 302 read with Sections 111 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that one Hindwa had had an intrigue with a Berni girl of the name of Patva. A neighbouring Thakur seems to have taken a fancy to the same girl. Hind1 a and Sukha were found travelling with the girl when another Thakur got hold of Hindwa and Sukha, locked them up and sent the girl and her mother away, Sakha and Hindwa were then released and later on arrived at the mother's house and asked for the girl. The mother said that she would fetch her. She apparently had no real intention of giving up the girl, and instead of producing her she brought the chowkidar. Hindwa again demanded the girl. The woman said that if he laid aside the gun that he was carrying she would fetch her. It appears that Hindwa had a gun and Sukha had a sword. Eventually when the girl was not given up, Hindwa fired at the mother. It appears from the medical evidence that Hindwa must have been standing very...
Jurawan and ors. Vs. Mahabir Dube and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-02-1918
Reported in: 44Ind.Cas.24
1. This appeal arises out of execution proceedings. The decree was dated as far back as the 28th of June 1904. In March 1915, an application was made for execution by attachment of certain property of the judgment-debtor. On that application (the 23rd of September 1915), two months' time was granted to the judgment-debtor to pay the balance of the decretal amount, he having paid Rs. 22 on account. No further step appears to have been taken on this application and it was struck off. On the 6th of September 1916, the present application was made. It sought execution in a different way. The application of the 31st of March 1915 was for execution by attachment of property. In the application of the 6th of September 1916, execution was sought by the arrest of the judgment-debtor. The judgment debtor raised an objection that having regard to the provisions of Section 48 of the Code of Civil Procedure the decree being now more than twelve years' old, an order for execution could not be made. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›