Allahabad Court November 1912 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohan Lal Vs. Musammat Jumerat
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-02-1912
Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.658
Rafique, J.1. This is an application in revision under Section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act. The facts, which have led to the making of the present application, are as follows: Musammat Jumerat, the opposite party, was employed by the applicant in December 1907, to suckle and nurse his infant girl. Musammat Jumerat served the applicant up to January 1910. In November 1910, she instituted a suit, in the Court of Small Causes at Jhansi, to recover Rs. 150 on the allegation that she had been employed by the applicant at Rs. 10 a month to suckle and nurse his child and served him for 26 months, for which she had not been paid anything. She gave up her claim for Rs. 110 and claimed only Rs. 150. The defendant-applicant denied having employed Musammat Jumerat as a wet-nurse at Rs. 10 per month. He further pleaded that the claim was barred by limitation. The learned Judge disallowed the pleas in defence and decreed the claim for Rs. 150. It is urged on behalf of the applicant in this Cour...
Jaisari Singh and ors. Vs. Jaisari Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1912
Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.294
1. Before we proceed to consider the points raised in this appeal, it is necessary to set out step by step the various stages through which the appeal has passed up to the present date. The petition of appeal was admitted on the 11th of November 1911 and an order was given to fix a date under Order XLI, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petition came up on the 25th of November 1911 in pursuance of the last order and the order then passed was: Let the record be sent for at the appellants' expense.' The necessary fee for carrying out this order was not deposited till the 6th of December. The case was put up again on the 20th of January 1912 and the order passed on that date was: 'Let notice go' The notice was to the effect that the 7th of March was the date fixed for the hearing of the appeal. It is a custom in this Court to issue notices upon respondents only. So far as the appellants are concerned, information of the date is given to the learned Vakils, who represent them, by...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›