Allahabad Court July 1910 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopi Vs. Jaldhara
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-04-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.697
1. The sole question in the appeal depends upon the true construction of the Will of one Mohan Lal, dated the 28th of February, 1881. Mohan Lal had two daughters, namely, Lila and Maya. Both these daughters were married, Bhaskaran being the husband of Lila. Lila left a daughter, namely, the plaintiff Jaldhara. According to the Will of Mohan La], which is a short document, after setting out that life was transient and, therefore, it was necessary for every person to make arrangements during his life-time so that after his death his name may be perpetuated and commemorated, he directs that after his death his daughters, Musammats Lila and Maya, shall be the owners in possession of the whole of the property in his possession like himself. Nothing' is to be found in the Will to qualify the terms of his gift. The sole question before us is whether or not this gift to his two daughters was a gift to them as tenants-in-common or as joint tenants. Bhaskaran, the husband of Lila, and Maya execu...
Kunwar Raghubir Singh Vs. Musammat Moti Kunwar
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.188
ORDER1. This is an application that money deposited in the Collector's Court to satisfy a decree obtained by the respondent, Musammat Moti Kunwar, should not be paid over to her until she has deposited security for the due performance of such order as His Majesty in Council may make in an appeal which is now pending against a decree of this Court. The suit out of which the appeal arose was brought by Musammat Moti Kunwar in the Court of the Assistant Collector of Etawah to recover profits of certain property. That Court granted the plaintiff a decree. Thereupon an appeal was preferred to the High Court, with the result that the High Court affirmed the decision of the Court below. An application was then made for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council. In this case, as also in a case in which the title of the appellant to the property, in respect of portion of which the claim for profits was made by Musammat Moti Kunwar, application for leave to appeal was made to this Court. The Cou...
Chatar Singh Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.420
Tudball, J.1. The applicant Chatar Singh has been convicted of the offence of perjury under Section 193, Indian Penal Code, and has been sentenced to 6 months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10. This conviction and sentence were upheld on appeal by the Sessions Judge. Briefly put the facts, out of which the prosecution arose, were as follows:One Ishri Prasad brought a suit against Chatar Singh seeking to recover from him the rent of a certain house and also his ejectment from the property. Chatar Singh filed his written statement on the 10th May 1908. His defence was that he was the owner of the house and in respect to the two agreements to pay rent, dated the 6th of December 1895 and the 20th of September 1892, which had been put forward by the plaintiff, he pleaded that he had left blank' stamped papers in the plaintiffs possession and probably the plaintiff had drawn up on those papers false agreements to pay rent. He was examined by the Court on the 10th of December 1908. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›