Advanced Search Results
Uoi Vs. Nand Kishore and ors.
Delhi
Nov-01-2010
Administrative Tribunals
Administrative Tribunals Act - Section 19
by the Railway Board, the respondents Nos.1 to 21 filed an application bearing No.1174/1986 under Section 19, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 before Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi.7. After holding that although Railway Board decided to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrashant Ramesh Chakkarwar and anr. Vs Union Public Service Commission ...
Delhi
Oct-05-2010
Administrative Tribunals
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - section 19 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - sections 420, 464, 471, 120B
by the marks awarded to them in the Main Examination, the petitioners filed applications under Section 19, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 before Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi inter-alia, alleging that the possibility that there
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and anr. Vs S.K.Mathur and anr.
Delhi
Oct-21-2010
Administrative Tribunals
Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 - Section 19
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, the said respondent filed an application under Section 19, Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, before Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi. The primary stand taken by the said respondent before
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India and ors. Vs. Brigadier P.S.Gill
Supreme Court of India
Mar-23-2012
Armed Forces Tribunal
Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 - Sections 30, 31
the maintainability of an appeal before this Court against a final decision and/or order of the Armed Forces Tribunal arises for consideration in these two appeals that purport to have been filed under Section 30 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJc 722890x Subedar B.K. Singh Vs Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-14-2010
Armed Forces Tribunal
Army Act, 1950 - Section 164 (2) ; Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 - section 17; Constitution of India - Article 226
to grant liberty to him to file a fresh appeal against the GCM proceedings before the Armed Forces Tribunal.2. Before dealing with the prayer made in the application, it becomes necessary to notice a few essential facts.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnshoo Pandey and ors. Vs Uoi and ors.
Delhi
Oct-21-2010
Administrative Tribunals
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - section 19 ; Constitution of India - Article 226, 227
did not respond to the representations made by the petitioners, the petitioners filed application under Section 19, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 before Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi. The case projected by the petitioners before the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishal Yadav Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Police
Delhi
May-23-2011
Tribunal
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 14(1)(a)
petitioner as to how the present petition would be maintainable inasmuch as it appears that the Central Administrative Tribunal would have jurisdiction over the matter.4. The counsel for the respondent also contends that the present writ petition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChander Pal Vs. the Cmd
Delhi
Nov-24-2011
Tribunal
Administrative Tribunal Act - Section 14(2), 33 C (1); Constitution of India - Article 226
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 30 th May, 2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1988/2010 preferred by the petitioner; by means of the aforesaid order the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and ors. Vs. S.C. Sharma
Delhi
Jul-07-2011
Tribunal
CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; Central Administrative Tribunal Act - Section 19; Constitution of India - Rule 226
orders passed by the disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority, the respondent approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) by filing O.A. 390/1997 under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act. The enquiry as well
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of IndiA. Vs. V.Santhabai and Others.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-12-2010
Tribunal Act
Railway Claims Tribunal Act - Section 23
The respondents filed O.A.A.No.255 of 1999 before the Secunderabad Bench of Railway Claims Tribunal claiming compensation, on account of the death of V.Chander Naik, husband of the 1st respondent and father of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »