Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: tenency · Page 1 of about 56 results (0.013 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 15 1992

Anurag Misra, Revisionsts Vs. Shri Ravindra Singh and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 20(1), 39 and 115; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act - Sections 20(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR1994All174

charges since July, J 975. The plaintiff further alleged that according to the terms and conditions of the tenency, the defendants were to bear the water-tax and that they would pay water-tax at the rate of Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2012

Subash Chandra Biswas Vs. the Controller of Thika Tenency

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-11-2012

Subject : Education

THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SUBASH CHANDRA BISWAS Versus THE CONTROLLER OF THIKA TENENCY GOVERNMENT & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY The Hon'ble JUSTICE MRINAL KANTI SINHA Date :11. h

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1972

Jagan Nath Vs. Abdul Aziz and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1973Delhi9; 9(1973)DLT108; 1972RLR80

different limes.'(15) At common law and prior to the change effected by statutes in England, the position regarding tenency in common n respect of the unity of possession was the same as it was in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 2009

Bhag Chand Vs. A.D.J. No. 5 and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-04-2009

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2009Raj178; RLW2009(3)Raj2081

been let out on or after 1st January, 1950,the rent payable at the time of commencement of the tenencyshall be liable to be increased at the rate of 5% per annum and the amount of increase of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2009

Shri Santoshkumar Shivgonda Patil and ors. Vs. Shri Balasaheb Tukaram ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-02-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 65 and 257, 257(1) and 257(2); Bombay Land Revenue Act, 1879 - Sections 65 and 211; Bombay Tenency and Agricultural Lands Act, 1976 - Sections 84C; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11(6) and 21

Reported in : JT2009(13)SC69; 2010(2)MhLJ150(SC); 2009(12)SCALE278; (2009)9SCC352; 2009(9)LC4126(SC):2009AIRSCW6305

order was passed too late.14. While dealing with the suo-motu revisional power under Section 84-C of the Bombay Tenency and Agricultural Lands Act, 1976, this Court in Mohamad Kavi Mohamad Amin v. Fatmabai Ibrahim : (1997) 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2005

Sogra Khatoon and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Tenency Act - Sections 48C and 48D; Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act - Sections 45B; Ceiling Act - Sections 48D; Bihar Tenancy (Amendment) Rules, 1992

application before the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, West Champaran, Bettiah, on 23.6.1988 under Section 48-D of the Bihar Tenency Act which was registered as Batai Case No. 25 of 1998-1999. Petitioners claimed that initially the husband of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2009

Joseph Nadar, Vs. Victor Suvisesha Muthu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record and Tenancy Rights Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(8) and 15; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Tiruchirappalli Kaiaeruvaram and Mattuparam Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Tamil Nadu Public Trusts (Regulation of Administration of Agricultural Lands) Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 and 100

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ1095

to Section 15 of the Act-X of 1969:Section 15:PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS OF ENTRIES IN THE APPROVED RECORD OF TENENCY RIGHTS:ANY ENTRY IN THE APPROVED RECORD OF TENENCY RIGHTS SHALL BE PRESUMED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT UNTIL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1961

Purushothaman Nambudiri Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-05-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31, 31A(1) and 31A(2), 32, 83, 104(3), 107, 111, 168, 168(2), 170, 171, 172, 172(1) and (2), 194(3), 196, 196(5), 197, 197(1) and (2), 198, 200, 201, 207 and 356; Kerala Agrarian Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 1 to 40, 57, 58, 60, 74 to 79 and 81 to 95; Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1951; Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1955; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 2(5); Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR1962SC694; [1962]Supp1SCR753

included in clause (2)(a) can take in only the rights and liabilities controlled and created by the two Tenency acts to which he has referred. That is how the petitioner contends that the Puravaka lands are also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1981

Brahma Kumari Vs. Sarwan Singh and

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-1981

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 19(1981)DLT53; 1981(2)DRJ117; 1981RLR486

his tenant on the following, terms:- a) That the respondent No. 1 will surrender the premises in his tenency to the landlord which included, besides the portion occupied now by respondent No. 2, a garage. b) That

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1989

S.S.A.S. Baluchamy Chettiar Vs. A.J.P. Ibrahim

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-1989

Subject : Tenency

Reported in : (1989)2MLJ411

ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. The petitioner herein is the landlord, whose petition for eviction on the grounds of bona fide requirement for own occupation and commission of acts of waste, has failed before the Rent Controller and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial