Advanced Search Results

Smt. Padmabati Debi Vs. Chittaranjan Dasgupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 13(6); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 106; ;Evidence Act - Section 114; ;Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 39(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 100

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT516(HC)

this suit was filed after service of notice of ejectment under Section 13(6) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act upon the defendant No. 1 by registered post with A/D as well as under Certificate of Posting.

Bhaiya Ram Hargo Lal Vs. Mahavir Prasad Murari Lal Mahajan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 111

Reported in : AIR1969P& H110

(3 of 1949) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on August 27, 1965, and that the contractual monthly tenancy of Bhaiya Ram tenant had not been terminated any earlier by any other notice. The saving of the … tenant's written statement, the receipt of the notice was denied. No issue was framed regarding the factum of service or validity of the notice referred to above. The Rent controller passed an order for ejectment which was

Siddheswar Paul Vs. Prakash Chandra Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 13(1), 17, 17(1), 17(3), 21, 22, 22(1) and 22(3)

Reported in : AIR1964Cal105,68CWN30

case relating to proceedings under Sub-sections ( ) and (3) of Section 17 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The opposite party landlord instituted a suit against the petitioner tenant on 14th September, 1960, for … of summons is served, to deposit in Court or pay to the landlord within one month of the service of the, writ of summons an amount calculated at the rate of rent at which it was last

Naresh Chadha and ors Vs. Dharamveer Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

aforesaid observations of the first appellate court will show, the appellants failed to lead any evidence whatsoever of service of the legal notice terminating the contractual tenancy of late Diwan Singh in his life time. No proof … original tenant Sh. Diwan Singh at the time of his death was a contractual tenant since his contractual tenancy was not terminated during his life time by sending him a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer

Sm. Daya Moyee Sadhukhan Vs. Dal Singer Singh

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 17(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 6(1) and 7- Order 11, Rule 21

Reported in : AIR1979Cal332,83CWN663

Clauses (m), (o) and (p) of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act. The plaintiff determined the tenancy of the defendant by the service of a notice to quit, calling upon him to vacate the suit

Prahladbhai Rajaram Mehta Vs. Popatbhai Haribhai Patel and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 28, 630, 630(1) and 630(2)

Reported in : [1996]87CompCas557(Guj); (1995)2GLR1752

are not attracted in the present case as there is a bona fide dispute with regard to the tenancy right in relation to the disputed room. 2. That the prosecution initiated by the company is barred by … substantial and significant question that arises for consideration and determination is whether a conviction and eviction of a service occupier under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, for withholding company's premises after termination of employment, by

Mangilal Vs. Suganchand Rathi Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111, 113 and 114

Reported in : AIR1965SC101; 1964MhLJ124(SC); [1964]5SCR239

the arrears within one month of the service of the notice dated April 11, 1959 upon him. The tenancy being from month to month it was open to the plaintiffs to terminate it by giving 15 days'

Krishan Kumar Jaggia Vs. Jag Mohan Bhardwaj

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of property Act, 1882 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR1986Delhi142; 28(1985)DLT193

has ceased to be in such service or employment. Clause (i) does not take In its fold every tenancy. It contemplates special tenancy which could be conveniently called a service tenancy. The premises must have been let

Govinda Mout Vs. Tarak Nath Shah

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2;; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 13

Reported in : (2000)3CALLT254(HC)

Rs. 55/ per month and Govinda paid rent to the landlord Tarak Nath in respect of the said tenancy upto the month of January, 1986. But on 4.3.86 Tarak Nath and his men attempted to dispossess Govinda … there was apprehension of encroachment thereof by the out slders. The defendant also represented that he was in service in the office of the Navy Commander as a gardener (Mall) and would render voluntary services to the

Sh. Ram Kumar Vs. Sh. S.K. Gulati

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the appellant from shop No.103-B, 1st Floor, Meghdoot Building, 94 Nehru Place, New Delhi earlier in the tenancy of the appellant/defendant and for recovery of mesne profits/damages for use and occupation from the appellant/defendant.5. The counsel … relied on Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd. Vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) 2011 (183) DLT 71.laying down that service of summons of the suit is sufficient service of the notice upon the defendant of the landlord not