Advanced Search Results
Veena Gael Vs. Pawan Kumar
Delhi
Sep-14-1987
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21
1987RLR646
Colony, in 1973, the landlady appellant applied for permission u/s 21 of the said Act for creating a tenancy in favor of Vinod Kumar for three years mentioning that the premises are not needed by the landlady … and the same has to be paid back.(3) After the expiry of 3 years period for which the limited tenancy was created in pursuance to permission granted by the Arc, another petition u/s 21 of the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtma Steels (P) Ltd. Vs. Harbir Singh
Delhi
Nov-01-1985
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21
29(1986)DLT456; 1986(10)DRJ216; 1986RLR73
Act') can be made in a petition for recovery of possession of the demised premises under a limited tenancy created under Section 21 of the Act.(2) The facts germane to the disposal of this appeal succinctly are … paralyse it. It would render that tribunal incapable of properly deciding the matters entrusted to it. The only limitation to this power is that this be necessary for the ends of justice, or to prevent an abuse
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhai Mahavir Vs. Radhey Raman
Delhi
Feb-23-1993
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21 and 39
50(1993)DLT100; 1993(27)DRJ66; 1993RLR330
rent agreed upon was Rs.650.00 per month exclusive of water and electricity charges and the terms of the tenancy settled between the parties are recorded in the proposed lease-deed of which copy was attached with the application … the proposed lease-deed of which copy was attached with the application and thus permission was sought for creating limited tenancy under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control act.(3) The petition was marked to Shri R.L. Chugh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shiv Chander Kapoor Vs. Amar Bose
Supreme Court of India
Nov-28-1989
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rule 27; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 and 21; Administrative Law
AIR1990SC325; 1989(2)SCALE1168; (1990)1SCC234; [1989]Supp2SCR299
assails validity of the Rent Controller's permission granted under Section 21 of the Act for creation of a tenancy for limited period arises for determination in the present case.3. The premises is the second floor of the … Section 21 is the answer.Section 21 overrides Section 14 precisely because it is otherwise hedged in with drastic limitations and safeguards itself against landlords' abuses....What, then, are those conditions and safeguards The first condition is that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.W. Bagga Vs. Janak Raj Sharma
Delhi
Nov-25-1986
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rule 20
1987(12)DRJ1
of two years from that date. By order dated 5/1/1977 learned Controller allowed the appellant to create mited tenancy favor of respondent under Section 21 of 'the Act' for a period of two years from the date … a period of two years from the date of the order for resident(3) The period for which the limited tenancy was created expired on 4/1/1979. The tenant did not vacate. The landlady, on 19/4/1979, moved, an application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Kumar Vs. Inder SaIn Minocha and anr.
Delhi
Aug-14-1981
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17
AIR1982Delhi260; 20(1981)DLT515; 1982(3)DRJ69; ILR1981Delhi733a; 1982RLR1
2, 1973 they entered into an agreement with the appellant, Shri Vijay Kumar Bajaj, for creating a limited tenancy in his favor in respect of a portion on the second floor of that house consisting of one … April 2, 1973 they entered into an agreement with the appellant, Shri Vijay Kumar Bajaj, for creating a limited tenancy in his favor in respect of a portion on the second floor of that house consisting of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.R. Vohra Vs. India Export House Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-14-1985
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14, 21, 37, 37(1) and 56; Constitution of India - Article 227; Delhi Rent Control Rules, 1959 - Rule 5
AIR1985SC475; 1985(1)SCALE219; (1985)1SCC712; [1985]2SCR899; 1985(17)LC721(SC)
tenant under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act)2. A tenancy for a limited period of three years commencing from 1.6.1979 in respect of a house at 34, Paschmi … the Act are concerned there is only one rule being Rule 5 which merely provides for period of limitation by saying that every application for recovery of possession under Section 21 shall be made by the landlord
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Puri and ors. Vs. Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-07-1995
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 96, Rule 1
AIR1995Delhi203; 57(1995)DLT560
Company in these proceedings to make the necessary statements and sign the requisite papers. The possession of the tenancy premises was not handed over to the owners/landlords after the expire of period of limited tenancy which led … with the pronouncements in other and later cases. In viewof the pronouncements of this Court as to the limitations on the permissible challenge to the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 21, any appeal to the remedy based
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritpal G. Singh and anr. Vs. O.P. Gupta
Delhi
Jul-08-2004
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21
113(2004)DLT131; 2004(76)DRJ135
let to the respondent for the limited period. Request was made for grant of permission to create limited tenancy from 16.3.1979 was made. The parties have filed affidavits in support of this application. Sh. R.L.Chugh, the then … verandah of house No. H-3/17, Model Town to the appellant Om Prakash Gupta for residential purpose for a limited period for four years from 16th March 1979 on the allegation that the respondent had gone abroad for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwarn Kanta Mehra Vs. Vinay K. Mahendra
Delhi
Sep-06-1995
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148A; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21
60(1995)DLT290; 1995(35)DRJ41
the Controller, the respondent/tenant has continued in possession of the premises till date though the period of limited tenancy expired on 30th April 1983. (2) Briefly the facts are that the appellant is the owner/landlady of a … by a tenant at the earliest, during subsistence of lease. The statute does not prescribe any period of limitation in this behalf. It is settled law that Section 21 of the Act is a self contained Code.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »