Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: tenancy criminal · Page 1 of about 2,127 results (0.019 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 25 1991

Gour Kishore Das Vs. Krishna Kumar Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-25-1991

Subject : CriminalTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 9; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 29, 31 and 34; ;Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 256

Reported in : (1991)2CALLT267(HC)

to English calendar months. The tenant-opposite party filed an application Under Section 31 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 against the petitioner before the Rent Controller, Calcutta alleging wilful obstruction in the supply line of … was allowed by the learned Rent Controller. Thereafter, summons was served Under Section 68 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by hanging by the bailiff and 22.8.90 was fixed for appearance. On 22.8.90 the present petitioner did

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1960

The State Vs. Kr. Keshva Sen and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-09-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 146

Reported in : AIR1960Raj279; 1960CriLJ1497

Chhangani, J. 1. This is a reference by the Civil Judge, Beawar under Section 243 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act and the only point which calls for determination in this reference is whether the expression 'a civil … also. 2. The facts which have given rise to this reference may be briefly slated as follows: In criminal proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P. C. State v. Keshav Sen and Raghunath, the S. D. M, Beawar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1911

Ajudhia Prasad Vs. Ram Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-20-1911

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All197

of the District Judge. To this the respondents reply that the principal court of original jurisdiction under the Tenancy Act is the court of the Collector.3. The word 'case' has been the subject of many conflicting decisions … that the case is governed by Clause (6) of Sub-section (7) of Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and that on a proper construction of that Clause the District Judge had jurisdiction. It is contended

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 20 1911

Ajodhia Parshad Vs. Ram Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-20-1911

Subject : Education

Reported in : 13Ind.Cas.284

of the District Judge. To this the respondents reply that the principal Court of original jurisdiction under the Tenancy Act is the Court of the Collector.2. The word 'case' has been the subject of many conflicting decisions … that the case is governed by Clause (b) of Sub-section 7 of Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and that on a proper construction of that Clause the District Judge had jurisdiction. It is contended

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 1980

Sm. Mayabati Halder Vs. the Rent Controller, Calcutta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-24-1980

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 31; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 247 and 495; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Rules, 1956 - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1981Cal118,85CWN296

the said Ranjit Kumar Nandy filed a petition of complaint under Section 31 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 before the Rent Controller, Calcutta alleging inter alia that his landlady, the said Sm. Mayabati Halder … complainant, the petition of complaint should be dismissed in view of the provision of Section 247 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898. The learned Rent Controller by his order dated May 24, 1977 overruled the said contention

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1910

Shaik Madhu Vs. Shaik Sahar Ali

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-30-1910

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 6Ind.Cas.177

the truth or otherwise of the allegation of the defendant that he held the disputed land under a tenancy created by one of the proprietors before the dispute which culminated in the criminal proceedings. The plaintiff has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

M/S T G Leisure & Resorts ( P) Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Ram Kumar Gupt ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-05-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

post dated cheques towards rent and service tax were handed over at the time of creation of the tenancy. The ten cheques which are subject matter of the pending criminal complaints from which the present proceedings arise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1992

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Shriram Babulal Chaurasiya

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C and 15

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR201

this case being altogether different, it is of no assistance to the plaintiff.8-E. Section 124 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 deals with the bar of jurisdiction. Section 124 (i) specifies that … of the Maharashtra Food Grain Control Order read with section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and a Criminal Case No. 2325 of 1973 was filed against him. He was tried and eventually was acquitted by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1934

Amanul Haq and ors. Vs. Girdhar Gopal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-13-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934All886; 150Ind.Cas.775

where appeals ordinarily lie from the appealable decrees of a Collector sitting as an appellate Court under the Tenancy Act. Under Section 243, Agra Tenancy Act, Local Act 3 of 1926, an appeal lies to the District … Bajpai, J.1. This is headed as a Criminal Revision but I think, more appropriately, it should have bean filed as a civil revision inasmuch as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2008

Sri Yudhishthir Roy Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Oct-25-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR689(Jhr)]

lessee.5. On the point of law, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that special provision under Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act, 1949 with reference to Section 67 has been laid down which is itself a penal provision for … petitioner under Sections 406/420/452 & 188 I.P.C. pending before the C.J.M., Deoghar and further quashment of the entire criminal proceeding commenced on the basis of such F.I.R.2. The fact of the case as stands narrated in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial