Advanced Search Results

Bimla Rani Gupta Vs. S.R. Sachdeva

Court : Delhi

Subject : TenancyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)637; 84(2000)DLT171; 2000(53)DRJ388

The learned counsel also submitted that once the agreement is not admissible in evidence not being registered, the tenancy becomes a monthly tenancy, and, thereforee, the petitioner was well within his rights in instituting the suit for … was presented in March, 1996. The respondent filed an application, purporting to be under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, stating that there was a Rent Agreement between the petitioner and the respondent on the 3rd

Gaajra International Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : TenancyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 20; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)209; 96(2002)DLT581; 2002(62)DRJ217

petitioner repliedthe said letter challenging the contention of therespondent reiterating that Clause 1 of the agreementnowhere stipulated that tenancy could be terminated bythe respondent by giving any notice much less notice ofa duration of one month period. … A.K. Sikri, J. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The prayermade is that the respondent be directed to appoint anarbitrator in terms of the arbitration

Raghubir Saran Maheshwari Vs. Vith Additional District Judge, Muzaffar ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 21, 30 and 40; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 15 and 25

Reported in : AIR1995All349

as well as having used it for a purpose other than for which he was admitted to the tenancy. The suit was contested and the allegations were denied by the petitioner.4. The J.S.C.C. by his judgment and … the impugned judgment passed on the award is assailed on the ground of non-applicability of the provisions of Arbitration Act to Small Cause Suits. Reference in this connection is made to Section 40 of Arbitration Act. The

Bharat Sewa Sansthan Vs. U.P. Electronics Corporation Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8 and 8(1); Societies Registration Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 11, Rule 14; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2007SC2961; 2007(3)ARBLR299(SC); 2007(4)AWC3565(SC); JT2007(10)SC463; 2008(1)MhLj555; 2007(10)SCALE446

of the accommodation let out to the respondent-Corporation.4. It is further the case of the appellant-Sansthan that the tenancy of both the portions of the accommodation let out to the respondent-Corporation had continued without any interruption from … filed by the U.P. Electronics Corporation Limited [hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent-Corporation'] under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been set aside with direction to the learned Additional District Judge to refer

Maha Ram and anr. Vs. Harbans

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property Civil

Reported in : AIR1941All101

Thom, C.J.1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit under Section 44, Agra Tenancy Act. The plaintiff sought to eject the defendants from certain plots of land. The defendants in their defence … a joint application to the Munsif in which they prayed that the matter in issue be referred to arbitration. The issue was referred to arbitration and in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 2, Civil P.C., arbitrators

Smt. Anannya Chowdhury and anr. Vs. Ranjit Kr. Bose and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationTenancy

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 11 and 16; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 - Sections 6 and 21; ;Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1982 - Section 41(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 254

in the tenancy agreement executed between the parties on 1st July, 2003. The said tenancy agreement contains an arbitration clause to the following effect:Clause 15: That any dispute regarding the contents or construction of this agreement or … HA-3 Bidhannagar, Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700097 under the opposite parties. The terms and conditions of such tenancy of the defendants are contained in the tenancy agreement executed between the parties on 1st July, 2003. The

Loyala School Rep. by Its Principal Vs. Megha Kumar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationTenancy

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 7, 8, 8(1), 11, 11(5), 11(6), 11(9), 16 and 42; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT556

they sent a quit notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, on 26-11-2008 determining the tenancy by giving fifteen (15) days notice and also alleging that defendant did not pay rents from 01-5-1999. The … is running Loyola School. The petitioner filed application being I.A. No. 415 of 2009 under Section 8(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act, for brevity) to refer the dispute to arbitration in terms of Clause

Vasantrao Laxmanrao Sahane and anr. Vs. Sanghvi Amritlal Becharlal

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1966)7GLR840

is directed to sell off the assets of the partnership firm including the entire machinery, the good-will, the tenancy rights and all other properties of the firm by public auction. As far as possible by a single … but the appeal was dismissed by the learned District Judge. Now according to the petitioners there was an arbitration clause in the partnership agreement and under the arbitration clause the parties were bound to refer the dispute

B. Arvind Kumar Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 17(2)

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD77(SC); [2007(4)JCR1(SC)]; JT2007(8)SC602; 2007(5)KarLJ243; (2007)6MLJ329(SC); 2007(8)SCALE520; (2007)5SCC745; 2007(2)LC823(SC); 2007AIRSCW4080; 2007CrLJ3741; 2007(3)KCCR1783

of facts:(a) The lease under deed dated 30.9.1921 (Ex.P1) was not a lease in perpetuity, but only a tenancy at will. (b) The sale certificate in favour of plaintiff's father (Ex.P3 dated 29.8.1941) was not followed by … that if there was any dispute or outstanding claim in that behalf, he should have sought reference to arbitration in terms of the lease-deed, and the suit was misconceived and not maintainable. 4. On the said pleadings,

Amarjit Singh Vs. Saroj Malik

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ArbitrationTenancy

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rule 20

Reported in : AIR1972P& H21

is not applicable, no ground of ejectment had to be mentioned. All that was needed was that the tenancy had to be terminated by giving a proper notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act … ejectment from Booth No. 55, Sector 19-C, Chandigarh. Amarjit Singh moved a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, praying that the proceedings in the suit be stayed, because there was an agreement between him