Advanced Search Results

Suresh Kumar Sud and ors Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Technology

Acts : Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 - Section 3(k)

be in the Research Faculty as Scientific & Design staff with respondent No.3, namely, the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "IIT, Delhi"). Admittedly, there are two well-defined services; one is the „teaching

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

that the Annex. 4 commencing from pp. 177 to 180 extracted hereunder List of industrial undertakings in Software Technology Parks/Electronic Hardware Technology Parks eligible for exemption under Section 10A__________________________________________________________________________________________S. No. Location of STP unit STPI/EHTP Date First

Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Versus Union of Ind ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

that the existing private UAS licensees may be permitted to expand their existing networks by using alternate wireless technology i.e. a UAS licensee who is presently using GSM technology for wireless access may be permitted to use

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and thereby quashed the chargesheet dated 19.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, the “IT Act”) and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

Teracom Private Limited and Shri Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)(124)ECC31

page 982, para 10(i) to 10(iii) of the SCN is that cellular phone means phones working on GSM technology, whereas the phones in question work on CDMA technology conforming to IS 95A specifications. The show cause notice

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Intex Technologies (India) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Adv. with Mrs.Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Mr.B. Prashant Kumar, Mr.Saurabh Anand and Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. versus INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Saikrishna Rajgopal, with Mr.J.Sai Deepak, Ms.Savni Dutt & Ms.Rachel Mamatha and Mr.Subhajit Banerji,

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Hewlett Packard Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

has erred in deleting the amount of Rs. 1,11,33,650 representing payments for the user of the rights, know-how technology, etc., despite the definition of royalty in Article VIIIA of DTA and the facts of the case being

Entergy Corp. Vs. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

source shall require that the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact.” 33 U. S. C. §1326(b). Sections 1311 and 1316, in turn, employ

4g Informatics (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD418; 2006(3)ALT92

Street, Moorsetown, New Jersey, USA (hereinafter referred to as 'Iridian Technologies'). Iridian Technologies developed for commercial utilization software technology for Iris Recognition. Iris Recognition is considered to be the most accurate Biometric Identifier. The holder of US