Advanced Search Results
indglobal Investment and Finance Vs. Rajasthan Breweries Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
May-03-2001
Service Tax
(2001)107CompCas525
proposal of allotment of shares and since no objection was raised, shares were allotted as against the loans.4. It is an admitted position that there is no written application or any written request or written agreement for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Cable Vision Vs. Star India Private Limited and
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Mar-06-2006
Service Tax
for first respondent submits that there is no subsisting agreement between the parties hence without any such agreement, it is not possible for the petitioner to seek signals from the respondent. While petitioner submits that in spite
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlok Pathak Vs. Bharti Cellular Limited and ors.
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Mar-29-2006
Service Tax
Registry.3. A copy of this order shall be communicated to the petitioner indicating the next date of hearing. It shall also be notified to the petitioner that he will be liable to pay the court fee of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tatineni Vidyadhara Rao S/O Late Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Apr-23-2007
Service Tax
Delhi and Anr. and pass a speaking order giving the rationale for taking a particular stand. We make it clear that we do not express any particular opinion on the merits of the case. Parties to bear
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodavri Shilpkala Ltd. Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of
DRAT Delhi
Dec-13-2002
Service Tax
III(2003)BC46
learned Counsel for the appellant points out that even at the time of advancing arguments on this application, it was pointed out, and she had undertaken to furnish the details as to why the witnesses are to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTab India and ors. Vs. Indian Bank
DRAT Delhi
Dec-16-2003
Other Taxes
III(2004)BC116
DRT with whom the records are lying if no case (OA/MISC/RC) is pending." 3. In view this Circular, it is open to the Presiding Officer of the DRT-III, Delhi herself/ himself to summon the records from DRT-II,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Gitadevi Jhunjhunwala and Vs. Central Bank of India
DRAT Mumbai
Jan-27-2004
Sales Tax
II(2005)BC137
affidavit. However, after going through those documents, which Mr. Raut, appearing for the respondent Bank sought to tender, it was revealed that those documents were not before the learned Presiding Officer, who passed the impugned order. In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSebi Vs. Century Consultants Ltd.
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Sep-12-2003
Other Taxes
certificate of registration. In this regard, I note that in terms of Regulation 15(c) of the enquiry regulations it is not necessary to hold an enquiry under the provisions of Regulation 13 where a stock broker ceases
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSebi Vs. Gfc Securities and Finance Ltd.
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Sep-12-2003
Service Tax
certificate of registration. In this regard, I note that in terms of Regulation 15(c) of the enquiry regulations it is not necessary to hold an enquiry under the provisions of Regulation 13 where a stock broker ceases
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSebi Vs. Valampuri and Co.
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Sep-26-2003
Service Tax
certificate of registration. In this regard, I note that in terms of Regulation 15(c) of the Enquiry Regulations it is not necessary to hold an enquiry under the provisions of Regulation 13 where a stock broker ceases
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »