Advanced Search Results

Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. Sanjay Grover and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47-A, 27, 35, 56

1899 as applicable to Delhi and setting aside the order dated 19th August, 2008 of the Collector of Stamps, Delhi. Notices of the petitions were issued. Pleadings have been completed and the counsels have been heard.2. The

The National Missionary Society of India Vs. the Inspector General of ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamps

Acts : Stamp Act - Section 2(24) r/w Articles 58(a)(ii), 62(e); Societies Registration Act; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(24), 33(A); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 80(g); Registration Act - Section 2(24)

of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Shri Digambar Jain and others v. Sub Registrar, Stamps, Indore(AIR 1970 MP 23) it is held thus:-"7. We are unable to agree with the Revenue-authority on the

Gayabai Hemlal Jadhav Vs. Hiraman S/O Rama Chavan

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17; Bombay Stamp Act - Section 33; Indian Succession Act - Section 276; Stamp Act - Section 35

of the document, the said document be ordered to be impounded and sent to the District Collector of Stamps for necessary action and till such exercise is completed, hearing of the application be deferred. 6 The application

Addl. Distt. Sub-registrar Siliguri Vs. Pawan Kumar Verma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : StampRegistration

Acts : Registration Act, 1908; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2(12), 47A; West Bengal Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 2001 - Rule 3

instrument of partition, whether the registering authority under the Registration Act, 1908 is bound by the assessment of stamp duty made by the court as per suit valuation, is the question arising for consideration in this case.3.

T.Paneer Selvam Vs. the Inspector General of Registration and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Section 33-A - Article 46-B (i) of Schedule I

executed by the petitioner and one Mr.S.Murugaiah on 17.10.2001 was presented for registration before the third respondent. The stamp duty paid on the Deed was Rs.100/-. The document indicated the value of the property divided under the

J.Thirukumaran Vs. the District Collector, Kancheepuram District and o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamps

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Section 2(14); Registration Act, 1908 - Section 78(m); Constitution of India - Article 226

notice, dated 1.6.2010 passed by the third respondent Sub Registrar, Pammal in demanding a sum of Rs.1,38,108/- towards stamp charges and differential registration charges of Rs.11,510/- in terms of Section 47B of the Stamp Act.2.When the writ

Sri Lakshmi Housing Enterprise Vs. Haji Begum and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Indian Stamp

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Section 38(1)

Reported in : AIR2011(NOC)183(AP)

by the respondents as to the admissibility of the document, on the ground that it was not properly stamped. According to the respondents, the agreement is required to be stamped as per Article 47-A of Schedule 1-A

Bhupendrabhai Rambhai Patel, Aged About 54 Years. Vs. Sau. Lilabai Mah ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Stamp Act - Sections 33 and 34, Article 25;

(Exh. 51) is misconceived. His contention is, in view of the provisions of Section 35 of The Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, (hereinafter referred to as Stamp Act), as the document was exhibited and admitted in evidence, later

Nahima Begum and anr. Vs.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamps

Acts : Trust Act; Indian Stamp Act - Section 47-A; Transfer of Property Act - Section 69

22.12.2010 and it is stated that for the value of the property, namely ` 1 Crore, the necessary stamp duty and registration charges have been paid.3. However, the third respondent has not released the document and he

K.Srinivasan Vs. the District Registrar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Stamp

Acts : Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules - Rule 23(III)

Vendor licence of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was granted licence to vend judicial, non-judicial and court fee stamps on 14.12.1992. The licence was issued under Rule 23(III) of the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules. Rule 23 of