Advanced Search Results

Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede vs Red Chillies Entertainments Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. Prior to its present posting, the plaintiff served as the Zonal Director, Narcotics Control Bureau, Mumbai (hereinafter ―NCB‖) on deputation. He claims that between the years 2013 and 2021, he received … ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE PLOT NO 612, RAMKRISHNA MISSION ROAD 15TH CROSS ROAD, SANTACRUZ (WEST) MUMBAI 4000542. NETFLIX ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES INDIA LLP LEVEL 11, GODREJ BKC, PLOT C 68 G-BLOCK, BKC-BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI 400051, INDIA3. X CORPFORMERLY KNOWN

Sandeep Kumar vs.central Bureau of Narcotics

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

DELHI CRL.A. 462/2016 & CRL.M.A.17384/2017 SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0807.2019 This appeal … receipt furnished with the application, had been produced, during trial, by PW- 11 Vinda Mahadik, Manager, UTI Technology Services, and had been proved as Ex. PW-11/A to Ex. PW-11/B3. In his statement under Section 313, Code of

Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga Vs. The State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

him before DCP Alok Kumar against one SI Ombir Singh of the Special Cell who was dismissed from service in 1999. PW-1 (SI Harbir Singh) is related to SI Ombir Singh as they are cousins. A-1 alleged … (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs Psychotropic Substance Act („NDPS‟), Section 489 C and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code („IPC‟) and

Sukhvinder Singh @ Sukhi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

him before DCP Alok Kumar against one SI Ombir Singh of the Special Cell who was dismissed from service in 1999. PW-1 (SI Harbir Singh) is related to SI Ombir Singh as they are cousins. A-1 alleged … (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs Psychotropic Substance Act („NDPS‟), Section 489 C and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code („IPC‟) and

Gurdeep Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

him before DCP Alok Kumar against one SI Ombir Singh of the Special Cell who was dismissed from service in 1999. PW-1 (SI Harbir Singh) is related to SI Ombir Singh as they are cousins. A-1 alleged … (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs Psychotropic Substance Act („NDPS‟), Section 489 C and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code („IPC‟) and

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

and 8.9.2004 respectively which were duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. On 1.2.2007 officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) conducted a search at the residence and office premises of the appellant but found nothing … Kedia, a highly qualified individual, set up two companies M/s. Xponse Technologies Limited (XTL) and M/s. Xponse IT Services Pvt. Ltd. (XIT) on 22.4.2002 and 8.9.2004 respectively which were duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956.

Ashok Solomon Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 40(1990)DLT388

your smuggling activities again (Annexure-ll). 4.Information was received that you Were an international drug smuggler and were exporting narcotics under the cover of some trade firms. This information was developed and large police contingent was placed in … organisation were assisted in Minneapolis Minnesota and 1296 Ibs of hashish was seized by the United States Customs Services Department of Treasury, U.S.A. The hashish had been imported from India through Los Angeles, California and shipped as

Rafiq Mohd. and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 29, 37, 37(2), 61 and 85; General Clauses Act - Sections 10; Official Secrets Act - Sections 3; Defence and Internal Security of India Act, 1971 - Sections 37; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20(7), 20(8) and 20(9); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2), 436, 437, 438, 439, 439(2) and 482; Defence and Internal Security of India Rules, 1971 - Rules 43 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 188;

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3366

upon by the learned counsel for, the petitioner, in view of this Court, also cannot be pressed into service in view of authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court in-Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lai's case (supra) which

illinois Vs. Caballes

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

(CA10 1997) (describing a dog that erroneously alerted 4 times out of 19 while working for the postal service and 8% of the time over its entire career); United States v. Limares , 269 F. 3d 794, … respondent for speeding and radioed in, a second trooper, overhearing the transmission, drove to the scene with his narcotics-detection dog and walked the dog around respondent’s car while the first trooper wrote respondent a warning ticket. When

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Praveen Dua and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.1 could not produce any documentary evidence for lawful possession of the said drugs, they were seized.4. Upon service of summons under Section 67 of NDPS Act, Respondent No.1 is supposed to have made a voluntary statement … * 2. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. No.303 of 2013 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Advocate. versus PRAVEEN DUA & ORS. .......Respondents CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR