Advanced Search Results

M.Chinnasamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith give 5 HP Electricity Service Connection to the petitioner's land situate in S.F.No.835/1B, Chinnasalem North, Kallakurichi Taluk,Villupuram based on his application dated 27.3.1992.

The Superintending Engineer Vs L R Palanisamy

Court : Chennai

1.4.2026 passed in W.P.No.11140 of 2026, whereby the learned Single Judge directed the appellants to effect one electricity service connection within a period of two weeks from the date of the order and the remaining service connections

S.Devaraj Vs. the Superintending Engineer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

has no locus standi to maintain the same. During the year 2000, his father applied for a separate electricity agricultural service connection with the consent of all the co-owners of the Well and obtained 5 HP agricultural … a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear respondents 1 to 4 from effecting name transfer and shifting of the service connection in L.T.Sc.No.184 (Agriculture) from S.F.No.313/1K of Dhidumal village and post 637 204, Paramathivelu Taluk, Namakkal District, to

M.L. Mallika and Another Vs. the Assistant Engineer, Tami Nadu Electri ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

is no other remedy available to the petitioners, the petitioners moved the first respondent by applying separate electricity service connections after obtaining orders from the Rent Control Court, once again, the petitioners requested for a service connection

State of Missouri, Ex Rel. Washington University Vs. Public

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

489 275 U.S. 537 No. 21. STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; No. 22. STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON … STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; No. 22. STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC

K.Raghavan, vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

Court : Chennai

and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further directing the respondents to effect electricity service connection in S.No.74/2 Po.Moorappur Village, Manaloorpettai, Villupuram District.For Petitioner : Ms.R.Poornima For Respondents : Mr.Swami SubramanianORDERThe petitioner has

J. Uppendra Reddy and ors. Vs. A.P.S.E.B. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1996(4)ALD22; 1996(4)ALT579; (1997)ILLJ585AP

decision claiming that it was wholly arbitrary and against the provisions of the Regulation 10 (iii) of A.P.S.E.B Service Regulations. Since there was no response from the Board, but on the contrary, orders were passed deeming the … Vasant Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh. (1988-I-LLJ-322) 4. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the Electricity Board submitted that the transfer orders also specifically preserved the lien and the seniority in the parent Circle,

K. Ajmal Khan and Others Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

stated that the writ petitioner herein had submitted his application to the first respondent requesting for single phase service connection to his plot along with indemnity bond and the No Objection Certificates dated 10.01.2014 issued by the … 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide the electricity connection to the petitioners property situated at Plot No.285, Syed Sadik Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai-112, without insisting on No

Board of Directors, Y.M.C.A. and anr. Vs. R.H. Niblett

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Orders 6, 29 and 41, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1957All219

struck off from the record.2. The plaintiff came to court with the following allegations. The plaintiff retired from service as a Magistrate and Collector in the year 1945. In the beginning of 1947, he rented some rooms … and Rs. 600/- in respect of the expenses, trouble and inconvenience resulting from interference with the supply of electricity.4. The suit was resisted by the defendants on a number of grounds. They pleaded that they never committed

T.M.Prakash Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tiruvannamalai-4, stating that in respect of poromboke land, inside/outside Girivalam path, there is no need to provide electricity service connection, till a separate decision is taken, by the Committee, after consulting Municipal authorities, Panchayat authorities and Revenue