Advanced Search Results

K. Raamaselvam and Others Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by Its Chief ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : SARFAESI

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Sarfaesi Act and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules - 2002; Sarfaesi Act - Section 17

Reported in : 2009(5)CTC385; 2009(5)LW127; 2010(1)MLJ313; AIR2010Mad93

it was observed by the learned single Judge as follows:-"8. Parliament has enacted an Act named as the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In exercise of powers under Section

Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi and Another Vs. State Bank of India and Anoth ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Securitisation

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

in the year 2002.2. The petitioner committed default in respect of the said loan Consequently, proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short " the Securitisation Act")

Raj Pal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Securitisation

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), - Article 226

Consequently, proceedings under theSecuritisation and Reconstruction of FinancialAssets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002 (in short " the Securitisation Act") have beeninitiated against the petitioner. 3. We have heard Shri Kuldeep Kumar Mishra,learned counsel for the petitioner,

Lumbini Gardens Limited, Bangalore. Vs. Debt Recovery Tribunal, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Securitisation

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFASI) - Section 18

Reported in : 2012(1)KarLJ334; 2012(1)KantLJ334

clear that the petitioners have approached the Appellate Authority by filing an appeal under Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. It is open to the petitioners

K.R.Chandrasekaran Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest(SARFAESI) Act, 2002 - Section 13(4)(2), 14, 13(3A), 14(2), 17, 17(3), 13(8); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14, 19(1)(e), 19(1)(g), 21, Schedule 9; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29

226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Declaration, declaring that Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is null and void.PRAYER in W.P.No.30223

Khaja Industries Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 9, 13, 13(3), 13(3A), 13(4), 13(10), 15, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 18, 19, 34, 35, 37, 41 and 42; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91, 93, 98 and 101; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5 and 56; Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1965; NPA Act - Sections 35; Companies Act, 1956; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Transfer of Property Act; APCS Act, 1964; Bengal Money-Lenders Act; Government of India Act, 1935; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies A

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR887; 2008(2)BomCR860; 2007(6)MhLj712

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent banks under the provisions of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Securitisation

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1941 - Sections 22 and 22(3); Assam Control Order, 1961; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 79; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), 32, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of the Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 78(2) and 81; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A, 81, 91, 100, 190, 224 to 233, 235 to 351, 391-394, 433, 617, 619 and 643; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Industrial Courts Act, 1919; Industries (Development and Regulation Act, 1951; International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958; Madras Agriculturalists' Relief Act; Recovery of

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

papers placed before this Court. The learned Counsel also had taken this Court through different provisions of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter in short referred to as

Kamaldeep Synthetic Ltd., by Managing Director V. Nandakumar Vs. Indus ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(10), 17, 17(2), 29, 31, 32, 34, 35 and 36; Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Limitation Act, 1963; State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 3 and 31; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas52(Mad); (2007)1CompLJ190(Mad)

Recovery Tribunal-I, Chennai.(C) The petitioner received a notice dated 20.12.2005, purported to be under Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Act 54 of 2002) (hereinafter called

A. Venkatramani Vs. Lic Housing Finance Limited, Rep. by Its Authorise ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2), 13(3), 13(4), 14(1) 17, 35, 36 and 37; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(1); Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Companies Act, 1956; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; State Financial Corporation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 29 and 31; Maharashtra Cooperatives Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 101; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 55(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 62; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas514(Mad); [2007]78SCL222(Mad)

petitioners are challenging the Demand Notices issued by the' ' financial institutions ' 'under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Act 54 of 2002) (in short

ionik Metallics and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

the questions that had arisen for consideration were whether the provisions contained in section 2 (1)(o) of the Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [hereinafter referred to as the Securitisation