Advanced Search Results

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshan Aghadi, Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Private Security Guards

Acts : Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 -Section 23, 2, subsection (8)(10) , clause 13(1)(a); Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Section 2 , 15,

also relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court on the aforesaid aspect in the case of the Securities Board for Gr. Bombay and Thane Districts etc. vs. Security and Personnel Service Pvt. Ltd. and others 1.

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the findings and sentence dated 14th October, 1997 of the Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter) as well as the order dated 26th September, 2007 passed by the Director General

Chanchal JaIn Vs. Securities Exchange Board of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Securities

Acts : Securities Exchange Board of India Act 1992 - Section 11

by the learned Trial Judge with reference to the powers conferred upon SEBI vide Section 11 of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act 1992, which section reads as under:-"11 (1) Subject to the provisions of this

K. Raamaselvam and Others Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by Its Chief ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : SARFAESI

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Sarfaesi Act and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules - 2002; Sarfaesi Act - Section 17

Reported in : 2009(5)CTC385; 2009(5)LW127; 2010(1)MLJ313; AIR2010Mad93

favour of the second respondent as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the provisions of Sarfaesi Act and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.2. Bereft of all details, the basic facts are as follows:-The present writ petitioners are

Pebam Ningol Mikoi Devi .Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : National Security

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Section 3(2), 8, 9, 12(1); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 17/20

preventive detention and have his liberty curtailed by virtue of his incarceration under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter "NS Act").4) Individual liberty is a cherished right, one of the most valuable Fundamental Rights

Ms. Sea Poly Plast India Pvt. Ltd. and ors Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Security

Acts : Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Rule 8 (5), 9(1);

1. The Petitioners have challenged the constitutional dmt 2 wp1956 validity of Rule 8 (5) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. These Rules have been framed by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred

Shri Santosh Kumar Sur Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Central Industrial Security Force

Acts : Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 1969 - rules 1, 34, 30 ; Section 9

present writ petition assails the memorandum dated 19th October, 1985 issued by the Commandant of the Central Industrial Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `CISF' for brevity) proposing to hold an inquiry against the petitioner and communicating

M/S Indus Valley Estates and Farms ... Vs Secretaries and Exchange Boa ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Securities & Exchange Board of India

Acts : Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 24 (1), 27

the petitioner/accused No.1 for summoning the witness in respect of audit carried out by the auditor of the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) & another. Respondent No.1 had filed a complaint under Section 24 (1)

Bpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

These six appeals are directed against the common order dated 19.4.2001 made by Shri D.R.Mehta, the then Chairman, Securities and Exchange Board of India. By the said order the Appellant in appeal No.14/2001 ( the Appellant company)

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2004)49SCL117SAT

appeals they have challenged the order dated 9.9.2002 containing certain decisions arrived at, and directions given, by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).3. SEBI received certain complaints relating to the acquisition/control of SEAMEC. It had