Advanced Search Results

Shri Rajan Sharma Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

W.P.(C) No.1761/2012. The learned Single Judge has interpreted the provisions of Sections 5, 7 and 10 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred as the Act) and held that as per the said provisions, a person … that as per the said provisions, a person who has completed his term as a member of the Railway Claims Tribunal would not be eligible for being appointed for a second term at the same post. The appellant

Sh. Rajan Sharma Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking directions for being appointed as a member of Railway Claims Tribunal, w.e.f. 14.3.05 inasmuch as it is pleaded that the petitioner was in fact called for interview, was … list is prepared by a committee comprising of a Judge of Honble Supreme Court; Chairman, Railway Board; Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal and the Secretary, Ministry of Law.2. On behalf of respondent Nos.1and 2, it is not disputed that

Union of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Single Judge of this Court dated 17.09.1996 passed in M.A. No.172 of 1993 under Section 23(1) of the Railway Claims Tribunals Act, 1987 awarding Rs.1,32,87,749/- towards the claim made by the respondent is under challenge in this appeal.2. … Nationalized Bank. When the matter was sub judice before the Subordinate Judge, Rourkela, due to establishment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, the aforesaid Money Suit was transferred to the said Tribunal, which was registered as T.A. No.289

N. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 4th November, 1957, took voluntary retirement in November, 1989 and was appointed as the Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal for a tenure of 5 years from 8th November, 1989. On completion of the tenure, the applicant … tenure, the applicant retired on 7th November, 1994. His additional pension for the service as Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal was fixed at the rate of Rs. 293/- per month or 3,500/- per annum taking into account

M/S Kalpataru Agroforest Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 18(1) and (3), 23, 30 and 30(2); Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 20, 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 74

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT76

ORDERS.C. Pandey, J. 1. This appeal under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is directed against the order dated 27-10-98, passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Bench Bhopal, in … under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is directed against the order dated 27-10-98, passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Bench Bhopal, in Review Case No. 18/98, whereby the review application filed by the appellant against the

Rermal Padmanabhan Vs. Tribunal for Local Self Govt.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

decision reported in Pushpakaran v. Union of India [2008 (1) KLT161. That was a case arising under the Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989. However, on going through the Rules, it is seen that unlike R.8 of the … 'Pushpakaran v. Union of India' [2008 (1) KLT161. That was a case arising under the provisions of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 and the Railway Claims (Procedure) Rules, 1989.9. Rule 18 of the Procedure Rules provides for

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secretary, Railway Board, Min ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Members) Rules, 1985 - Rule 15A; ;Railway Claims Tribunal (Salaries and allowances and conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1989 - Rules 3, 4 to 14 and 15; ;High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1999; ;Bar Councils Act and the Original Side Rules; ;High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1); High Court Judges (Travelling Allowances) Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 217, 229 and 235 to 237

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC703

Tribunal, Madras Bench, directing to fix the pension of the applicant (second respondent) for his service as Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal under Rule 15 of Railway Claims Tribunal Rules read with para 9 of Part-I of Schedule I … pension of the applicant (second respondent) for his service as Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal under Rule 15 of Railway Claims Tribunal Rules read with para 9 of Part-I of Schedule I to the High Court Judges ( Conditions

P.N.Peruvazhuthi Vs. the Railway Board and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 - Section 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 217, 323A

Advocate, is challenging the selection of candidates to the posts of Vice Chairman and Member (Judicial) in the Railway Claims Tribunal.2. The Ministry of Railways has issued a notification on 27.6.2005, inviting applications, in the prescribed format, to … the posts of Vice Chairman and Members (Judicial) against the existing and prospective vacancies at various Benches of Railway Claims Tribunal. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner has submitted his application dated 12.7.2005. Since he did not receive any communication

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunals Act, 1987 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2) and 18(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 210 and 228; Limitation Act - Sections 18 and 29(2)

Reported in : 2003ACJ647; AIR2001AP526; 2001(5)ALT448

Matched in: Advocate Deepak Bhattacharjei, Adv. T. Ramakrishna Rao, S.C. for Railway

S. Rama Murthy Vs. Addl. Registrar, Rly. Claims

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Service Tax

have the jurisdiction to adjudicate the matters pertaining to the conditions of service of a Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT), The applicant was a Member of the RCT. He has appeared in person before us in … in person before us in the present OAs, being aggrieved by certain decisions of the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal allegedly affecting the conditions of his service adversely.2. Since the issue of jurisdiction is a basic and