Advanced Search Results

Mr Mudit Saxena Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

TOWER2, 19TH FLOOR, SEPNAPATHI BAPATM MARG, ELPHINSTONE ROAD, MUMBAI400013. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.6. PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, PROPERTY BEARFING NO5 MATHURSHIRI ASRCDE, 100F FT RING ROAD, 1ST PHASE, 2ND STAGE, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE560076. ALSO AT9H FLOOR, … S, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. MAHESH S, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE R6 FROM TAKING ANY PRECIPITATIVE ACTION AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND DIRECT THE

Smt Neelaveni a M vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTION TO R1 AND 2 ATTACH THE R3, 4, 5 MOVABLE PROPERTY U/S 3 OF KPIDFE ACT 2004 (KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT 2004) AND

Sri Kemparaju vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

PER ANNX-C UPDATED IN THE WEB PORTAL IN HTTPS://landrecords.karntaka.gov.in/service131/ form57/ OF THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.,-4- IN WP NO. 12869/2025 BETWEEN: SRI N.HANUMANTHARAJU SON OF LATE NARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 … SRI LIKITH R.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R-1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER FILED UNDER

C.M. Subramanya and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Constitution of India, praying to restrain the respondents from taking proceedings from acquiring portion of the property described in the Schedule to the W.P. without due process of law for Acquisition and etc. Prayer: These

Sri R Shankaran Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Land Acquisition Act called Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout, issued by second and third respondent in respect of schedule property vide Annexure-A and etc; IN W.P. Nos.32187 AND3409634098 OF2010BETWEEN: Shri Dharma Narayana, S/o. Sri. Venkatarajaiah, Aged about 55 … and 3 ) ***** for the Layout This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act

The State of Bihar Vs. Maharajadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singh of Darbhang ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : [1952]1SCR889

List II and entry 42 of List III which read as follows : '36. Acquisition or requisitioning of property, except for the purposes of the Union, subject to the provisions of entry 42 of List III. 42. … Patanjali Sastri, C.J.1. These appeals and petitions which fall into three groups raise the issue of the constitutional validity of three State enactments called The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), The

The Century Twenty-one (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 86

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi124; 1987(12)DRJ69

conferred upon it by Article 19(l)(f) of the Constitution of India, i.e. freedom to hold and dispose of property. The petitioner filed this writ petition on 24/3/1972. On that date Article 19(l)(f) of the Constitution was in

Sri P.Trivikrama Prasad, S/O.Late P.Venk Vs. Enforcement Directorate, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

proceeds of crime, knowingly became party and are actually involved in possessing, projecting and claiming that as untainted property and hence guilty of offence of Money Laundering in terms of Section 3 of the Act, 2002. Enforcement … have no other alternative remedy, except invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Learned senior counsel therefore urged that provisional attachment order be set aside.14. Learned senior counsel placed

M/S Sobha Limited vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ANNEXURE-A WITH EFFECT FROM 11.01.2021 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, MANIFESTLY ARBITRARY, UNREASONABLE, UNENFORCEABLE, -3- AN UNREASONABLE RESTRICTION ON RIGHT TO PROPERTY BEING EXPROPRIATARY, AN INFRINGEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PROPERTY UNDER ARTICLE 300A AND FAILING THE TEST OF ARTICLE … KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (1) DECLARE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 299A AND 299C INSERTED INTO THE KARNATAKA

Deputy Commissioner and Collector, Kamrup and ors. Vs. Durga Nath Sarm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Assam Acquisition of Land for Flood Control and Prevention of Erosion Ordinance, 1955 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 5, 6(1), 6(2) and 17; Land Acquisition Act; Assam Acquisition of Land for Flood Control and Prevention of Erosion (Validation) Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(2), 31, 31A, 31(2), 31(5), 301 and 254(2); Madras Marumakkathayam (Removal of Doubts) Act, 1955; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act; Assam Embankment and Drainage Act, 1941; West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948; Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1954; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR1968SC394; [1968]1SCR561

Act No. 6 of 1955 as it is a law for the prevention of danger to life or property within the purview of Art. 31(5)(b)(ii). This contention is somewhat novel, and requires close examination. 15. Our attention … and Act No. 21 of 1960 on the ground that they contravened Arts. 14 and 31(2) of the Constitution. The High Court held that (1) Act No. 6 of 1955 was violative of Art. 31(2) of the