Advanced Search Results
The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-2026
Land Acquisition
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 227
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 227 : 2026 INSC 33 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda (Civil Appeal No. 92 of 2026) 07 January 2026 [J.B. Pardiwala* and … deemed to be a court for certain limited or specified purposes, such a legal[2026] 1 S.C.R. 229 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda fiction must not be extended beyond the purpose for which the fiction
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Trust Co. Vs. Wabash Western Ry. Co.
US Supreme Court
Nov-20-1893
Land Acquisition
Company. The new corporation assumed all the obligations of the old ones, entered into possession of all the property, issued bonds to the amount of $17,000,000, secured by a general mortgage to the Central Trust Company, and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Limited Vs. U.P. State Electricity ...
Allahabad
Jan-09-1992
Electricity
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provinsions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 17(1), (2) and (3), 18, 19, 19(3) and (4), 20, 22, 22(1) and 23; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24; Village Panchayat Act - Sections 129; Constitution of India - Article 133(1)
AIR1992All247; [1992]75CompCas672(All)
are in the nature of execution against the properties of the Company, firstly because electricity connection is the property of the Company and thus by having recourse to the provisions of S. 24 of the Indian Electricity
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Baldev Krishna Sahi Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Limited and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-17-1987
PropertyCompany
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630(1)
(1987)89BOMLR450; (1987)3CompLJ57(SC); 1987(3)Crimes449(SC); [1989(58)FLR142]; JT1987(3)SC581; (1988)IILLJ202SC; 1987(2)SCALE544; (1987)4SCC361; [1988]1SCR168
A.P. Sen, J.1. The Companies Act, 1956 by Section 630, enacts:630. Penalty for wrongful withholding of property-(1) If any officer or employee of a company-(a) wrongfully obtains possession of any property of a company; or(b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Komal Manu Sahani Vs. Pure Drinks Ltd. and Another
Mumbai
Jun-14-2013
Education
object of Section 630 of the Act, the object being to provide a summary procedure for retrieving the property belonging to the company. Therefore, expansive interpretation is required to be given to the provision, as against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCar-o-liner Ab..Decree Holder Vs.
Delhi
Jan-14-2011
Land Acquisition
Ltd. on 08th February, 2007. Since the decree was passed only against TTC Laser Machine Pvt. Ltd., the property, belonging to the company alone, could have been attached in execution of the decree.3. The Decree Holder filed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGangubai Poonja Angre and anr. Vs. Mukesh Textile Mills and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-08-2002
CompanyCriminal
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630(1)
2002(3)MhLj218; [2003]41SCL27(Bom)
petitioners- accused are guilty under Section (1)(a) or (1)(b) or both; (2) That the petitioners-accused had not acquired property wrongfully therefore cannot be prosecuted because acquiring property wrongfully is the gist of offence under Section 630(1)(a); (3) … Judge. 6. Admitted facts are that the respondent No. 1 is the owner of the premises i.e. the Company registered under the Companies Act and all the Petitioners-accused are occupants of the Company premises either as employee
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvon Cycles Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Mar-26-1996
Direct Taxation
amount had been shown as security by the assessee and had been utilised by Shri Pahwa for acquiring property at Safdarjang Enclave, New Delhi. The AO disallowed a sum of Rs. 2,70,000 as interest on the ground … manufactured by the sister concern and all the goods manufactured were to be sold only to the assessee company. It was submitted that in the next year the assessee had exported sales of multi-speed freewheels. It was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Srinivasan, Gautham S. Varad, Vs. H.S. Viswanath, Mohan Reddy and
Company Law Board CLB
Sep-04-2006
Land Acquisition
(2007)75SCL59
Matched in: Court Company Law Board CLB
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaryana and Steel Centre Vs. Lakshmi Parcelains Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-22-2003
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457 and 457(1)
2003(5)ALT665; [2004]50SCL669(AP)
attain finality by virtue of ordering repeated resales, there is a possibility of the diminishing value of the property involved and there is also the possibility of not securing the better price at any point of time … No. 6/93 and pass such other suitable orders. By an order dated 2-9-1998 in R.C.C. No. 6/93 the Company Court had directed the winding up of M/s. Lakshmi Porcelains Limited and appointed Official Liquidator as Liquidator under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »