Advanced Search Results

Kamal Chatterjee Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 161, 164, 165, 405, 409 and 411;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 197;; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5, 5(1, 2, 3A and 4), 6, 6(1), 7, 7-A, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(1), 14, 15 and 17;; West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 2(1, 2 and 3), 4, 4(1 and 4), 6, 7(1 and 3), 9, 10 and 13;; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 4(3), 5, 6, 7 to 15, 19, 19(1) and 28;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 197(1);; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952;; West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Amending Act, 1953 - Section 3, 6 to 10, 13 and 26;; Constitution of India - Article 254(1)

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT98(HC),1998(1)CHN139

Goswami contended that the West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courls) Act, 1949 stands vertically repealed by the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. His contention is that after the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 come into force, the Special … Act, 1949 stands vertically repealed by the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. His contention is that after the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 come into force, the Special Judges appointed under section 2 of the West Bengal Criminal Law

State of Karantaka vs B G Prakash Kumar.

Court : Karnataka

COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY ALLOWING THIS RP. IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1714/2023: BETWEEN:1. STATE OF KARNATAKABY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN … COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION. IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.166/2024: BETWEEN:1. THE STATE OF

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Spl.C.C.No.208/2004 - Convicting the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of … Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and the Appellant/Accused No.1 is Sentenced to Undergo Simple Imprisonment for a Period of Four Years, and

Jaysingh Wadhu Singh, (Through His Next Friend in the Family I.E. His ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3(2)and(5), 5, 6, 7, 13(1), 14(1)(2)(4)(10) (11)and (13), 14(11) and (13), 15(3), 23(1), 25 and 50; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 385 and 387; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 226, 227 and 482

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)470; (2001)1BOMLR205; 2001CriLJ456; 2001(3)MhLj208

Special Court on 12th June, 2000. The sanction for taking cognizance as required under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was accorded by the Government on 8th August, 2000. The sanction order was produced before the … offences under section 24 of the M.C.O.C. Act read with section 13(1) clause (d)(i) and (ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 1988 and thereupon kept the case for framingof charges. As already indicated, the said order dated 25th

K. Jayarama Iyer Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1954CriLJ464

the facts constituting an offence under Section 342, Hyderabad Penal Code, also constitute an offence under Section 5(2)(c), Prevention of Corruption Act which describes the same offence and as according to Section 26, General Clauses Act, when an act … the Magistrate had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the case against the accused, after the extension of Prevention of Corruption Act to Hyderabad State and the enactment of Criminal I am Amendment Act. Learned Advocate for the revision-petitioner

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Maj. I.C. Lala Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 161, 165, 165-A, 420, 466, 467 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4(1), 156, 173, 196-A, 196-A(2), 197, 235, 239 and 439; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1974 - Sections 5, 5(2) and 5A

Reported in : AIR1973SC2204; (1973)2SCC72; [1973]3SCR818; 1973(5)LC629(SC)

1963 all of them agreed to commit or cause to be committed offences under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and of cheating punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and these offences having been … a conspiracy were punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 420 I.P.C. Mr. Gupta, the businessman was charged under Section 420 I.P.C. as well as

Bindra Ban Brijlal Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 5(4) and 6; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71 and 409; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1957P& H110; 1957CriLJ659

arguments addressed to me in Criminal Appeal No. 73 of 1956 the vires of Section 5(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was challenged on the ground that it offended against the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution, … Constitution. 2. The appellant in this case was tried upon a charge punishable under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The nature of the charge was that he being a public servant had dishonestly misappropriated monies which

Manmal Bhutoria Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

C. R. Bhattacharjee of the Indian Army was charged with an offence under Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Major Bhattacharjee was invalidated from the military service with effect from 14th February, 1966. He is … abusing his position as a public servant for obtaining undue pecuniary advantage under Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 1947.4. The question raised in this appeal is a new one. The point is that the jurisdiction

C. Rangaswamaiah and Others Vs. Karnataka Lokayukta and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka State Lok Ayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 15(1) and 23; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 15 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 8 and 13; Central Act - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR1998SC2496; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)400; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)372; JT1998(5)SC64; 1998(4)SCALE266; (1998)6SCC66; [1998]3SCR837

State of Karnataka.3. The point raised in these SLPs is whether the investigation Under Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 entrusted by the State of Karnataka to the Police Officers of the State having the requisite … on deputation with the Lokayukta could not have been entrusted with die investigation Under Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In writ petition 17819/94 filed earlier by another public servant which went before a learned single

L.K. Advani Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)53; 1997CriLJ2559; 1997(4)Crimes1; 66(1997)DLT618; 1997(41)DRJ274; (1997)116PLR1; 1997RLR292

public servants, the legislators thought it fit and proper to frame a comprehensive legislation in the form of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 as the existing laws in the form of Sections 161 to 165A Indian Penal Code, they … thereafter. Subsequently in order to further strengthen the anti- corruption laws and to make them very effective the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was passed which received the assent of the President of India on September 9,1988.(2) The present