Advanced Search Results

V. Parthasarathy Aiyangar and ors. Vs. Doraiswami Naicker and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : TenancyTrusts and socieites

Reported in : AIR1923Mad308; (1923)44MLJ91

I.A. 145 where Sir Mentague E Smith in delivering the judgment of their Lordships, observes:' But notwithstanding that peoperty devoted to religious purposes is, as a rule, inalienable, it is, in their Lordships' opinion, competent for the

Javvadi Venkata Satyanarayana Vs. Pyboyina Manikyan and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 13, 14, 16 and 20

Reported in : AIR1983AP139

provisions of S. 16 of the Act. None of the requirements of S. 16 of the Transfer of peoperty Act were satisfied and hence the settlement deed is operative in respect of both life interest and the

Harkisandas Bhagvandas and ors. Vs. Bai Dhanu

Court : Mumbai

Subject : property

Reported in : AIR1926Bom497

in Dinkarrao's case A.I.R. 1925 Bom. 84 it was held that (p. 117):Saetion 14 of the Transfer of Peoperty Act, which makes the rule against the perpetuities applicable In this country does not apply to merely contractual

Sri Harish Chandra and ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Articles 6 and 10; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1958All864

in the instant case is unattested but it is not, in our opinion, a hypothecation bond, hypothecating movable peoperty. In a hypothecation the possession over the property is retained by the owner. It is only certain rights

Om Sharan Vs. Banshidhar and 6 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : 1981WLN419

is one for damages for a personal wrong, and as a suit for partition is a suit for peoperty the rule in question has no application to it'. In G. Jayaprakash v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramswaroop and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)255

the record which explains how the accused persons had any right of private defence of their person and peoperty. In this respect, we have perused the entire record; the statement of the prosecution witnesses as well as

Jinitha vs Kolazhy Grama Panchayath

Court : Kerala

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE PEOPERTY OF THE PETITIONER AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THEVILLAGE

B N Ramachandrappa vs B N Srinivasaiah

Court : Karnataka

by: House of B.R.Chowdappa; North by: Vacant space of B.R.Chowdappa; South by: Vacant space of Vasantharaju. -9-13. House peoperty of asbestas sheet in zanzer No. 280 ofBijjavara, measuring East-West 21 feet and North- South 25 feet, bounded

icpa Health Products P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)(61)ECC197

a hygienic agent but is used as a therapeutic measure, due to its effective medicinal value and absorption peoperty in treatment and control of Plaque related diseases. He has further certified that the medical literature also indicates

Shantaram Tukaran Patil and anr. Vs. Dagubai Tukaram Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marraige Act, 1955 - Sections 16, 16(1), 16(3) and 25; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1), 8 and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1987Bom182; 1987(1)BomCR714; (1987)89BOMLR51; 1987MhLJ179; 1987Mah.L.R777

the property of Nana.15. The facats furhter disclosed that after Rama's death in the year 1966, the ancestral peoperty a had been partitioned bwtween Nana and Annappa. It mustbe noted that Nana had already a son, Shirpati,