Advanced Search Results

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1951 merely imposed licensing regulation on tobacco products under item 38(1) of the First Schedule. The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 in Section 14(ix) prescribes the rates for Central Sales Tax. Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of

M/S Vinyl Chemicals (India) Ltd Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

quantity in each container and the shortage was assessed by the surveyor engaged by the appellant. 2. Further, it is also the ground averred in the appeals that appointment of authorized surveyor under section 64 UM(1) of

Blake Vs. Mcclung

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

be incurred subsequent to the date of their registration or rendition. The said corporations shall be liable to taxation in all respects the same as natural persons resident in this state, and the property of its citizens

The Bengal Immunity Company Limited Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4; ;Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226, 286, 286(1), 286(1)(A), 286(2) and 286(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 13 and 33

Reported in : AIR1955SC661; [1955]2SCR603; [1955]6STC446(SC)

or order quashing 'the proceedings issued by the opposite parties for the purpose of levying and realising a tax which is not lawfully leviable on the petitioners' and for other ancillary reliefs. 2. The relevant facts appearing

Paul Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

comply with all the requirements of the statute respecting foreign insurance companies, including a tender of the license tax, excepting the provisions requiring a deposit of bonds with the treasurer of the State, and the production to

Sonachalam Pillai and ors. Vs. Kumaravelu Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1928)54MLJ8

is admittedly incorrect and it has been corrected. In prayer 1 the words 'and other Vaniyars' should be added between the words 'plaintiffs' and 'to worship' and at the end of the paragraph the words 'and to

Nilesh Mahadeorao Dhakare Vs. State of Maharashtra Department of Educa ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

was forwarded by respondents 3 and 4 to the respondent no. 2. By communication dated 31st March 2011 it was informed by the respondent no.2 that as the appointment of the petitioner was made against the post

A.M. Abdul Rahman Vs. V. Jayaram

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : ILR1990KAR2962

biased against him are:(1) that the Judge had refused his prayer for the appointment of an Engineer as Commissioner for local inspection of the premises in his occupation as he wanted to satisfy the Court that the

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)2CompLJ151TelecomDSAT

of cable systems between 10 and 25 years in their Balance sheet. They had also claimed a pre tax return of 23.66% on total investment, which includes unutilized sum of Rs. 625 crores raised through GDR issue.

Chambers Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

immunities of citizens in the several states?" Will not that constitutional guaranty be shorn of much of its value if any state can reserve, either for its own citizens or for the estates of its citizens, privileges