Advanced Search Results

Baidya Nath Singh @ Baijnath Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Patna

Subject : Narcotics

off against the sentence.2. Prosecution was set on motion on a written report given by one Ramesh Prasad, Customs Inspector, Motihari dated 29.1.2002. In the written report it was stated that a coded information was received at … judgment and order dated 8.11.2004 by which he has been convicted under sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 23(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced under each count to

R.N. Kaker Vs. Shabir FidahuseIn and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 14, 21, 41, 42, 42(2), 43, 44, 52, 53, 67 and 173; Evidence Act - Sections 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102(3), 161, 162, 173, 190 and 202; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 156; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 170; Central Excises Act, 1944; Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 8(1); Customs Act - Sections 108

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR503; 1990CriLJ144

Under sub-section (2) of Section 41, any such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of Central Excise, Narcotics, Customs, Revenue Intelligence or any other department of the Central Government or of the Border Security Force as is … (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of Central Excise. Narcotics, Customs. Revenue Intelligence or any other department of the Central Government or of the Border Security Force as is

Prem Mahant Sahani at Tadipar Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

said sessions case arose on the basis of a complaint filed by Shri G.B. Wakle, Inspector of Customs, Narcotics Cell, Customs Preventive Collectorate, Mumbai. The case of the complainant, as appearing from the complaint (Exhibit-1), may, in

M.S. Element Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(24)LC129Tri(Chennai)

and fittings under Section 115(b) and 115(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 60(3) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. On 26-9-1986, the Customs authorities at Bolghaty Kerala boarded the Yacht HOA.

B.D. Goel Vs. Austin M. Gracious and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

The said Section also gives powers to an officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the Central Government to authorise any officer subordinate to him but

Chubby Ekwealcoh Vs. V.A.K. Sekar, Asstt. Collector of Customs, Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 313, 323, 324, 342, 395, 436, 440, 452, 493, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202, 202(1), 203, 204(1), 208, 209 and 313; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, B(C), 21, 23, 28, 36, 36A, 36D, 36D(1), 42, 43 and 50(1)

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2238

of NDPS Act 1985 and for the offence punishable under Section 135(1)(a) read with Section 135(1)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962. However no such separate sentence was awarded. The same is under challenge in his appeal.2. The … in Sessions Case No. 1033 of 1987 dated 23-2-1993 under Section 21 read with Section 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter called 'the Act') and sentenced to suffer r/i for 10 years

Kalema Tumba Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 21, 23, 28 and 50; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2000SC402; (1999)3CALLT55(SC); 2000CriLJ507; 1999(4)Crimes352(SC); 2000(67)ECC6; 2000LC766(SC); 2000(115)ELT38(SC); JT1999(8)SC293; 1999(6)SCALE529; (1999)8SCC257; [199

at that time that he did not know English. Apart from the evidence of the officers of the Narcotics Department there is evidence of an employee of the Jewel Hotel where the appellant had stayed from 16th … airport by him and other officers. After the flight had arrived and the appellant had reported at the customs checking counter, Mr. Dange who had accompained Mr. Menon and Mr. Rohtagi, Asst. Director, questioned the appellant and

Anwar Singh Son of Shri Tej Mal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 8; Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 3(1), 7(C) and 11; Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13 and 67; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22(5)

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3012; 1995(1)WLC634; 1994(2)WLN677

the detention order was passed on 17-6-1993, On 29-3-1994, the petitioner was detained in a case under the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The detention order, which was passed on 17-6-1993, was served on the petitioner … Ajju Musalman of village Khara (Pakistan), which is a violation of Section 7(C) and Section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962, Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947- Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 3 and further it

Husen Bhenu Malad Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 23, 29, 30, 36A, 36B, 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 52, 52(3), 53, 55, 56, 57 and 67; Foreigners Act, 1946; Indian Passport Regulations Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 313 and 374(2); Evidence Act - Sections 24 and 25

Reported in : 2003CriLJ5070; (2003)4GLR916

a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that if raid conducted by specialized authority such as Narcotics Control Bureau, Customs, Central Excise, etc. they are not precluded from retaining contraband in safe custody at their

intelligence Officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (Dri) Vs. Amj ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 37(1), 42, 53, 53A, 57 and 67; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162 and 173; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108, 124 and 135; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25 and 27; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 171A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 19

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1309; 2003(3)MhLj954

admission.Justice Parkar was of the view that considering thescheme of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 108 ofthe Customs Act, Section 67of N.D.P.S. Act and thepowers of the Revenue Intelligence Officers, thestatement of the Respondent-accused was recorded … for the applicantnext placed reliance upon the case reported in 2001 ALLMR (Cri) 1445, Hasan Ismail Dalvi v. Narcotic ControlBureau and Anr. In the said case, the prosecution (NCB)had relied upon the statements of one of the