Advanced Search Results

iqbal Moosa Patel S/O. Mohammed Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 21, 29, 41, 42, 42(2), 43, 44, 49, 50, 50A, 57, 57A, 67 and 120B; Evidence Act - Sections 10, 24 and 106; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act; Customs Act - Sections 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 190 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1869 - Sections 120A and 120B; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3) and 21

Reported in : (2008)2GLR1598

conviction of the appellants-accused for the offences under Section 8(c), read with Sections 21 and 29, of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'NDPS Act') for possession and illegal smuggling and

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 6(1), 8, 22, 37, 53, 58 and 80; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 2; Drugs Act, 1930; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 53, 53A, 53A(1), 53A(2), 54, 58, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 and 67A; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 136

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT559

New Delhi in purported exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the PIT-NDPS Act'). The detention order in the

Sandeep Kumar vs.central Bureau of Narcotics

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

DELHI CRL.A. 462/2016 & CRL.M.A.17384/2017 SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0807.2019 This appeal

Koyappakalathil Ahamed Koya Vs. A.S. Menon and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 23, 28, 42, 43, 50, 50(1), 52, 54, 55, 57 and 67; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24 and 25; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act; Bombay Prohibition Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 100(1), 100(3) and 100(7); Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)26; 2002CriLJ4502

under provisions of Section 21 read with Section 8(c) and Section 28 read with Section 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to an 'NDPS Act' for convenience). The appellant has been

R. Mayilvahanam S/O Ramaiah Pillai and Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narco ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 23, 27A, 29, 35, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 50, 52 to 55, 57 and 68; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendmemt) Act, 2001; Evidence Act - Sections 125; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100 and 165; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(3) and 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4425; ILR2008KAR4166; ILR2008(4)Kar4166; 2008(4)KCCRSN251; 2008(5)AIRKarR408; 2008CriLJ4425;

of fine, to undergo R.I. for one year.3. Crl. A. No. 627/07 is preferred by the Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Chennai, questioning the legality of the acquittal of AS by the trial court in respect of

E. Micheal Raj Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 15, 17, 18, 21 and 29; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2008SC1720; 2008CriLJ2250; JT2008(4)SC523; 2008(2)KLT36(SC); RLW2008(4)SC3549; 2008(4)SCALE592; (2008)5SCC161; 2008AIRSCW2365; AIR2008SC1720; 2008(5)SCC161; (2008)2SCC(Cri)558; 2008CriLJ2250; 2008(2)AICLR793

Appeal No. 185 of 2004 whereby the conviction and sentence of the accused-appellant under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act') was confirmed.2. The relevant facts

Labh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 50 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197

Reported in : 2002CriLJ28; 2002(1)WLC692; 2002(1)WLN545

convicted accused appellants Labh Singh, Major Singh and Mangal Singh for the offence under Section 8/21,29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'NDPS Act'), accused appellant Mohd. Arshad for

Dr. Joy Kumar Singh Vs .The State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : IPC - Sections 380/411; NDPS Act - Section 22(c); NDPS Act - Section 29; NDPS Act - Section 21(c).

so lodged, CID Police Station Case No. 31/2009 under Sections 380/411 IPC read with Section 22(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act (in short, 'the NDPS Act') was registered. The samples were sent to Forensic

Syed Alam Vs. the State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : IPC - Sections 380/411; NDPS Act - Section 22(c); NDPS Act - Section 29; NDPS Act - Section 21(c).

so lodged, CID Police Station Case No. 31/2009 under Sections 380/411 IPC read with Section 22(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act (in short, 'the NDPS Act') was registered. The samples were sent to Forensic

State Thr. Int. off., Narcotics Con.Bur. Vs. Mushtaq Ahmad Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 1294-1295 OF2015(@ SLP(Crl) Nos. 8567-8568 of 2015) State through Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau ... Appellant Versus Mushtaq Ahmad Etc. ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.In this appeal, by special