Advanced Search Results
Bakshish Lal Vs. State
Delhi
Jan-09-1968
Criminal
Himachal Pradesh Passenger and Goods Taxation Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 3(3); Punjab Pessengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 22
4(1968)DLT330
nto guilty of the alleged offence. The third contention was that since the vehicle was registered under the Mtoor Vehicles Act, the registration was effective throughout India by virtue of the provision in section 28 of the Mtoor … Vehicles Act, the registration was effective throughout India by virtue of the provision in section 28 of the Mtoor Vehicles Act. and that, thereforee, the company could nto be held liable for non-registration. The fourth contention was that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohinder Singh Vs. Himachal Pradesh Government
Delhi
Jul-10-1968
Mtoor Vehicles
Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57; Punjab Mtoor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rules 4 and 13(2)
5(1969)DLT109
Punjab and Kalka-Simla route. The said permit was granted on 13th January, 1965, under section 57 of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939, on regular basis for a period of five years, i.e. valid up to 12th January, 1970. … 1950, the Kalka-Simla route lay in three States, viz., Punjab, Pepsu and Himachal Pradesh. Section 63 of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 provides for validation of permits for use outside the region in which it was granted. Sub-sections
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Kuldip Lal Bhandari and ors.
Delhi
Dec-09-1968
Mtoor Vehicles
Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110D
AIR1970Delhi37; 5(1969)DLT543
in an appeal preferred to the High Court against the award of the Tribunal under Section110-D of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939.(2) The present appeal was preferred before a Division Bench of this Court under Clause 10 of … learned single Judge in an appeal against the award of the Claims Tribunal under Section IIO-D of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter called the Act) is:-(1) a judgment, (2) given by a Judge of this Court within
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Thomas Toraneey and ors. Vs. Htoz Htoels Limited and ors.
Delhi
Sep-15-1967
Mtoor Vehicles
Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110
AIR1969Delhi3; 4(1968)DLT407
the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to try the suit was expressly barred by the provisions of the Mtoor Vehicles Act. (3) The Court framed a preliminary issue whether the Court had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of … jurisdiction to take cognizance of the suit in view of the provisions of section 110 F of the Mtoor Vehicles Act. The Court held that the claim of plaintiffs Nos 1 and 2 was barred under the provisions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Insurance Co. Ltd., Madras Vs. Swaran Kaur and ors.
Delhi
Mar-07-1967
Mtoor VehiclesInsurance
Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96, 100 and 101
AIR1967Delhi125
defendant No. 5 in the Court below in pursuance of a ntoice issued under Section 96(2) of the Mtoor Vehicles Act (hereinafter called the Act), has preferred this regular first appeal from the judgment and decree of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.D. Jain, J. Vs. the State
Delhi
May-30-1968
Criminal
Mtoor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 78; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 260
4(1968)DLT626
A of the Ninth Schedule or of any traffic regulation set forth in the Tenth Schedule of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, nor was it alleged that the accused had ignored any direction given to him by the police … police engaged in the regulation of the traffic at the road concerned. After reproducing section 78 of the Mtoor Vehicles Act, the learned Additional Session' Judge came to the conclusion that the allegations in the present case did
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaraIn Devi Vs. Dev Raj and ors.
Delhi
May-15-1967
Mtoor Vehicles
4(1968)DLT46
order, I also direct that the entire compensation amount shall be paid by the insurer, the third respondent. Mtoor Vehicles - compensation - respondents alleged of causing death of 'X' by rash and negligent driving - appeal for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Committee, Simla Vs. A.R. Pasricha and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd.
Delhi
Jun-06-1967
toher Taxes
Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 84
3(1967)DLT612
that fell for consideration by their Lordships of the Supreme Court : 'If the person ill-charge of any mtoor lorry laden with tax- able goods declares in writing to the moharrir at the import barrier that the … time 'accordingly in column 10 of the Transit Pass in Form O.2: Provided, that in case or (mtoor vehicle) traffic the period allowed shall nto exceed one hour and for toher traffic two hours except in special
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiya Ram Sharma Vs. Director General, Supplies and Disposalsand ors.
Delhi
Mar-01-1968
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
6(1970)DLT2
importance because the principles laid down by the High Courts of Madras and Andhra in cases under the Mtoor Vehicles Act were applied to a case relating to removal of a non-departmental branch post master by an order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunni Begum Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-15-1968
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 205, 205(2), 342, 540A and 540A(1)
AIR1968Delhi202; 1968CriLJ1162; 5(1969)DLT194
petty cases, and nto to compel him to come to Court personally in all cases. Cases under the Mtoor Vehicles Act and under some of the Municipal statutes may be mentioned as instances in point. (26) Even in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›