Advanced Search Results

Karnataka Lorry Malikara Okkuta (R), by Its General Secretary and ors. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : EnvironmentMotor Vehicles

Acts : Environment Act, 1986 - Sections 5; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 17 and 20; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 52 and 59; Constitution of India - Article 21; Water (Pollution and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4206; 2004(6)KarLJ1

atmosphere. It is also stated that Section 20 of the Air Act would override the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It is further stated that the vehicular population of the State is 40 lakhs and about … before us on 5.8.2004.5. Learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioners, Sri D.L.N. Rao submitted that under the Environment Act, it is the Central Government, which has got jurisdiction to issue directions and the State Government has

Malayath Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Motor VehiclesEnvironment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 120(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 208; Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3 and 3(1); Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 119 and 120(2); Central Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1999 - Rule 120; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Environmental Protection Law; Environmental Protection Rule; Environmental Protection Regulation

Reported in : III(2005)ACC617; 2005(3)KLT190

like hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Noise can adversely affect performance, for instance reading, attentiveness, problem solving and memory'.Motor vehicles fitted with horn is always a menace to the travelling public as well as pedestrians and people residing … The necessity of enforcing the provisions of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 was highlighted by the Apex Court in Church of God v. K.K.R. Majestic Colony Welfare

Dr. Anahita Pandole Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Depart ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 4, 39, 52, 117, 122, 312 to 313A, 314, 328, 328(3) and 328A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 28, 39, 41, 41(4), 109(3), 110, 110(1), 110(3), 112, 206 and 207; ;Environment Protection Act, 1986; ;Maharashtra Urban Areas Tree Preservation Act, 1975 - Sections 8(4); Bombay Police Act - Sections 33 and 102; ;Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(105) and 67; ;Main Roads Act, 1930 - Sections 33B; ;National Highway Act; National Highway (Land and Traffic) Act; Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules - Rules 48, 62(2), 72(2), 160, 206, 207 and 208; Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 12(1), 92, 105 to 111, 123 to 125A and 126; ;Motor Vehicles (Prescription of Conditions for Exemption) Rules, 1991; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 198

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR72; 2008(3)BomCR516; (2008)110BOMLR1555

guidelines either of the year 2000 or 2008, are apparently in conflict with different laws relating to traffic, motor vehicles, environment and regulation of heritage precinct. We would even say that there is somewhat nonapplication of mind by the … law per se - Guidelines of year 2000 or 2008 in conflict with different laws relating to traffic, motor vehicles, environment and regulation of heritage - Non application of mind by Commissioner while framing guidelines - Further, control and

Smart Chip Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 41, 41(3), 41(5), 64 and 65; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 2 and 81; Central Government Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR2003All80

induction of information technology it is necessary to standardize various, functions and technologies. This is vital because the Motor Vehicles Act under which these tasks are performed is a central Act which needs to be followed uniformly throughout … Department of U.P. does not conform to the standardized software circulated by theMORTH. This would lead to non-operable environment for such Smart Card based document and also have a potential to create the problem of vendor dependence

Shyam Sundar and anr. Vs. Mahesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008(2)WLN573

This is a different yardstick and cannot be made applicable to the present case, arising out of the Motor Vehicles Act.10. Learned Counsel for the respondent-company has also relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court delivered in … to the parents is irrecoupable, and no amount of money could compensate the parents. Having regard to the environment from which these children were brought, their parents being reasonably well placed officials of the Tata Iron and

M/s Sion Panvel Tollways Pvt. Ltd., through its Authorized Signatory, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a provisional completion certificate is issued, the State would issue a notification under the provisions of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 thereby authorizing collection of toll. According to the petitioners there was unjustified delay in issuance … a concession law. Transportation policy objectives typically include providing efficient mobility at lowest cost and with the least environmental impact, and facilitating economic development.â? âOnce a decision has been made to pursue a private toll road program,

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Centre for Environment Protection Research ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Green Tribunal, Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal, allowing Original Application No.1/2013 (CZ) filed by the Respondents and directing that motor vehicles not complying with the requirement of displaying a valid “Pollution Under Control” (PUC) Certificate would suffer the consequence … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8932-8933 OF2015STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ….Appellant versus CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT & ORS. …..Respondent (s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.These appeals filed by the State of

Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

For example, there are prayers made in this Petition complaining about noise pollution created by the use of motor vehicles. There is a direction sought against the first Respondent to lay down parameters in terms of decibel level … prayer in this PIL is for directing the Respondents to initiate penal action under section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short "the Environment Protection Act"). The grievance made in this Petition is that though

Smoke Affected Residents Forum Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act; Motor Vehicles Rules; Environment Protection Act; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR479; (2003)1BOMLR227; 2003(1)MhLj120

scrapped unless converted to cleaner fuel. Mr.Cama also contended that those directions are contrary to the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act and the Rules framed thereunder. 6. Mr.Chaudhary, who is appearing for the Taxi Owners Association in Notice … consisting of the then Transport Commissioner Mr.V.M.Lal, representative of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, representative of the Bombay Environmental Action Group, Dr.P.S.Pasricha, former Joint Commissioner of Police (Mumbai), representative of Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of

Ashok Kumar S/O Shankarprasad Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through It ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provisions of Maharashtra Act No. XXX of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 introducing “Environment Tax” by amending the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1958 Act” for short). However, during arguments Shri T.D. Mandlekar,