Advanced Search Results
Narmala Devi and ors. Vs Subey Singh and ors.
Delhi
Jun-01-2010
minimum liability Act
minimum liability Act - Section 95
arises whether this insurance cover obtained by the insured was limited to a liability of Rs.1,50,000/- being the minimum liability for which a vehicle was required to be insured by the owner or this premium covered wider liability. … at relevant time was as under:CLASS A(2) GOODS CARRYING VEHICLES-GENERAL CARTAGE (PUBLIC CARRIER) PREMIUM FORLicensed Carrying Own Damage Liability Act Capacity of the Cover to the Only Vehicle Public Risks(a) Not exceeding Rs.340 Plus Rs.120/- Rs.100/- 1016 Kgs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mst. Suraiya Begum and ors.
Delhi
Jun-01-2010
minimum liability Act
minimum liability Act - Section 95
arises whether this insurance cover obtained by the insured was limited to a liability of Rs.1,50,000/- being the minimum liability for which a vehicle was required to be insured by the owner or this premium covered wider liability. … and tariff rates are as under:CLASS A(2) GOODS CARRYING VEHICLES-GENERAL CARTAGE (PUBLIC CARRIER) PREMIUM FORLicensed Carrying Own Damage Liability Act Capacity of the Cover to the Only Vehicle Public Risks(a) Not exceeding Rs.340 Plus Rs.120/- Rs.100/- 6 Kgs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jagdish Babu and Othe ...
Mumbai
Jan-19-1982
Company
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 95, 95(1) and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLI, Rule 22; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923
[1988]63CompCas135(Bom)
its contract with the insured, the insurance company can cover a wider risk because 'Act liability' is the minimum liability which cannot be got over by the insurance company. But there is nothing in the Act which can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jagadish Babu and ors ...
Karnataka
Nov-22-1985
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95 and 95(1); Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 64UC
[1988]63CompCas733(Kar); ILR1986KAR2660
its contract with the insured, the insurance company can cover a wider risk because 'Act liability' is the minimum liability which cannot be got over by the insurance company. But there is nothing in the Act which can
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Antony Road Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi ...
Delhi
Dec-06-2017
Land Acquisition
writ petitions complaining that by virtue of the notifications dated 15th September, 2016 and 3rd March, 2017, the minimum wages payable to the workers have been steeply enhanced. So far as the services of the other staff … of the petitioners whose services were being utilized for these vehicles.4. These writ petitions are concerned with the liability of the respondents to compensate the petitioners/concessionaires towards wages which are payable to the staff engaged for operation … Singh, ASC(Civil) for GNCTD with Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA B Grain Spirits Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Dec-06-2017
Land Acquisition
writ petitions complaining that by virtue of the notifications dated 15th September, 2016 and 3rd March, 2017, the minimum wages payable to the workers have been steeply enhanced. So far as the services of the other staff … of the petitioners whose services were being utilized for these vehicles.4. These writ petitions are concerned with the liability of the respondents to compensate the petitioners/concessionaires towards wages which are payable to the staff engaged for operation … Singh, ASC(Civil) for GNCTD with Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGoverdhan Trasnport Co Pvt Ltd vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Delhi
Dec-06-2017
Land Acquisition
writ petitions complaining that by virtue of the notifications dated 15th September, 2016 and 3rd March, 2017, the minimum wages payable to the workers have been steeply enhanced. So far as the services of the other staff … of the petitioners whose services were being utilized for these vehicles.4. These writ petitions are concerned with the liability of the respondents to compensate the petitioners/concessionaires towards wages which are payable to the staff engaged for operation … Singh, ASC(Civil) for GNCTD with Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Metro Transit Pvt. Ltd. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Delhi
Dec-06-2017
Land Acquisition
writ petitions complaining that by virtue of the notifications dated 15th September, 2016 and 3rd March, 2017, the minimum wages payable to the workers have been steeply enhanced. So far as the services of the other staff … of the petitioners whose services were being utilized for these vehicles.4. These writ petitions are concerned with the liability of the respondents to compensate the petitioners/concessionaires towards wages which are payable to the staff engaged for operation … Singh, ASC(Civil) for GNCTD with Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendrakumar Chandulal Vs. Central Bank of India
Gujarat
Mar-30-1983
Contract
(1984)1GLR237
all the aforesaid documents even when read together do not establish that respondent had contracted out of the minimum liability envisaged under Section 151 of the Contract Act apart from the question that it was not open to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Linge Gowda Detective and Security Chamber (Private) Limited, Ban ...
Karnataka
Sep-03-1997
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Minimum Wages Rules, 1958; Abolition of Contract Labour Act
ILR1998KAR1715; 1998(1)KarLJ81
other employees.6. Mr. Sanjeev, learned Counsel for the contractor strenuously submitted that even according to the claimants no liability is fastened on to the contractor since detective agency does not come within the purview of the Minimum … by the principal employer. All the four writ petitions challenge the order passed by the authority under the Minimum Wages Act.2. There was an order by the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act directing the contractor and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »