Advanced Search Results

Indusind Media and Communications Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs New ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Civil Appeal No.2498 of 2018 Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL

Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), (2), 21(1), 38(2), 43 and 226; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9 (1-A); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7 (1); Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5B; Wireless Telegraph Act, 1933; Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Sections 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11; Radio Act, 1927; Broadcasting Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036

which is required to be answered is whether there is any distinction between the freedom of the print media and that of the electronic media such as radio and television, and if so, whether it necessitates more restrictions … exposes the citizens who are liable to pay the custom duties to the vagaries of executive discretion.In Odyssey Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. Lokvidayan Sanghatana and Ors. : AIR1988SC1642 it was held that the right of citizens to

CBS Vs. Democratic Nat'l Committee

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Lion, supra, at 395 U. S. 390 . Balancing the various First Amendment interests involved in the broadcast media and determining what best serves the public's right to be informed is a task of a great delicacy and … FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus The Democratic National Committee requested a declaratory ruling from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the Communications Act or the First Amendment precluded a licensee from having a general policy

M/S Craft Interiors (P) Ltd. Vs. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

be struck down.8. Learned counsel further submits that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Media Communications Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh 1997(105) STC227AP) struck down a pari materia provision (Section 5F of the

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Sh. Yashwant Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek and receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers" proclaims the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). The People of India declared in the … been truly said that it is the mother of all other liberties. The Press as a medium of communication is a modern phenomenon. It has immense power to advance or thwart the progress of civilization. Its freedom

M/S. Indsuind Media and Communication Ltd Vs. M/S. Star Broadband Serv ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

have been issued. 4. For re-transmission of signals received from any MSO other than the signals of IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd. You may please note that any commission or omission of acts mentioned in para 1 to 4 … i.e submission of forms and deposition of STBs, you may please contact our Finance Department immediately. For IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd. (Kamal Kant Joshi) DGM-Legal Copy to:- (i) TRAI, Old Minto Road, New Delhi for information. (ii) Mr.

Union of India and Others Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 7(1), 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 27(1), 28, 29, 30, 46, 53, 54, 55 and 100; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7(1), 20, 21, 21(2), 22, 22(1), 22(1A), 26, 27, 27(1), 28, 9, 30, 46, 53, 54(1), 54(2) and 55; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 31B, 31C and 39; Constitution of India (39th Amendment) Act - Sections 22; Registration Books Act, 1987

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR581

Kingdom, the radio and television are not under the absolute control of the State and these media of communications reach the people and educate them, so also inform of the news and views which are not necessarily … on par with the conditions in this country. In our country, radio and television - the two important media of communication are under the control of the State, and the only media of communication free from control,

Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTPConstitution

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 21 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31C and 39

Reported in : AIR1986Bom321

on par with the conditions in this country. In our country, radio and television -- the two important medias of communications are under the control of the State, and the only media of communication free from control,

Skilling Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

would be unable to obtain a fair trial in Houston. Despite incidents of intemperate commentary, the court observed, media coverage, on the whole, had been objective and unemotional, and the facts of the case were neither heinous … He submitted hundreds of news reports detailing Enron’s downfall, as well as affidavits from experts he engaged portraying community attitudes in Houston in comparison to other potential venues. The District Court denied the motion, concluding that pretrial

indraprastha People and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

ensure that the media does not become a feral beast.37. In the United Kingdom we find that the Communications Act 2003 regulates media broadcast. A statutory body named Office of Communication (OFCOM), consisting of a Chairman and … religion, for its persistent objectification, or some may call it itemization. They argue that the new forms of media and globalization need not answer for their persistent normalization of objectification. The trouble with the debate on cultural invasion