Advanced Search Results

Indusind Media and Communications Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs New ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Civil Appeal No.2498 of 2018 Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL … Civil Appeal No.2498 of 2018 Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19(1), (2), 21(1), 38(2), 43 and 226; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9 (1-A); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7 (1); Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5B; Wireless Telegraph Act, 1933; Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Sections 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11; Radio Act, 1927; Broadcasting Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036

which is required to be answered is whether there is any distinction between the freedom of the print media and that of the electronic media such as radio and television, and if so, whether it necessitates more restrictions … understanding of what 'telecasting' means and what its legal dimensions and consequences are. Telecasting is a system of communication either audio or visual or both. We are concerned in the present case with audio-visual telecommunication. The first

CBS Vs. Democratic Nat'l Committee

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Lion, supra, at 395 U. S. 390 . Balancing the various First Amendment interests involved in the broadcast media and determining what best serves the public's right to be informed is a task of a great delicacy and … FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus The Democratic National Committee requested a declaratory ruling from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the Communications Act or the First Amendment precluded a licensee from having a general policy

M/S Craft Interiors (P) Ltd. Vs. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

be struck down.8. Learned counsel further submits that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Media Communications Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh 1997(105) STC227AP) struck down a pari materia provision (Section 5F of the … struck down.8. Learned counsel further submits that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Media Communications Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh 1997(105) STC227AP) struck down a pari materia provision (Section 5F of the A.P.

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Sh. Yashwant Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek and receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers" proclaims the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). The People of India declared in the … been truly said that it is the mother of all other liberties. The Press as a medium of communication is a modern phenomenon. It has immense power to advance or thwart the progress of civilization. Its freedom

M/S. Indsuind Media and Communication Ltd Vs. M/S. Star Broadband Serv ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

so that CAS is properly implemented and subscribers do not suffer inconvenience. Thanking You Yours faithfully For IndusInd Media and Communication Limited (Kamal Kant Joshi) DGM-Legal” “Dated: 16.12.2006 To Shri Kamal Kant Joshi DGM-Legal 71/1, 2nd Floor, Shivaji Marg

Union of India and Others Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 7(1), 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 27(1), 28, 29, 30, 46, 53, 54, 55 and 100; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(1), 7(1), 20, 21, 21(2), 22, 22(1), 22(1A), 26, 27, 27(1), 28, 9, 30, 46, 53, 54(1), 54(2) and 55; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 31B, 31C and 39; Constitution of India (39th Amendment) Act - Sections 22; Registration Books Act, 1987

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR581

on par with the conditions in this country. In our country, radio and television - the two important media of communication are under the control of the State, and the only media of communication free from control,

Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTPConstitution

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 21 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31C and 39

Reported in : AIR1986Bom321

on par with the conditions in this country. In our country, radio and television -- the two important medias of communications are under the control of the State, and the only media of communication free from control,

Skilling Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

would be unable to obtain a fair trial in Houston. Despite incidents of intemperate commentary, the court observed, media coverage, on the whole, had been objective and unemotional, and the facts of the case were neither heinous … He submitted hundreds of news reports detailing Enron’s downfall, as well as affidavits from experts he engaged portraying community attitudes in Houston in comparison to other potential venues. The District Court denied the motion, concluding that pretrial

indraprastha People and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

and attachments to dogmas. And this presents the most difficult challenge to the mass media because it entails communication within audience from different sections of the society and across societies. Topics considered worthy of a broadcast arise … religion, for its persistent objectification, or some may call it itemization. They argue that the new forms of media and globalization need not answer for their persistent normalization of objectification. The trouble with the debate on cultural invasion