Advanced Search Results

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. R.L. Kalathia and Co.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

outside the balance sheet, and had shown the rental income from the said source as income from House Property. 6. In the enclosures to Form No. 3CD, in the notes to the accounts, it had been mentioned … 1,16,40,000/- credited the partners' capital account in the ratio of their share. The firm got converted into a limited company by the name of M/s. Kalathia Engineering and Construction Ltd. and the shares to the extent of

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. TexspIn Engg. and Mfg. Works

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 32, 34, 34(2), 43(6), 45, 45(1), 45(4) and 48 ; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 575

Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Bom)497; [2003]263ITR345(Bom); [2003]44SCL239(Bom)

by way of distribution' in Section 45(4) of the Act. There is a difference between vesting of the property, in this case, in the Limited Company and distribution of the property. On vesting in the Limited Company … return of income for the period 1-4-1995 upto 7-11-1995 stating that it had been thereafter converted into a Limited Company. The return of the remaining period from 7-11-1995 to 31-3-1996 was filed by the Limited Company at

Speaks Properties Limited vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14045 OF 2019 PETITIONER:SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED M/S.SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED, FORMELY (M/S. SYNTHITE PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS (P) LIMITED),HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THEKKEKKARA MANSIONS 2ND … reconsideration of the order, which is the challenge in the writ petition filed by the owner of the property.3. In Exhibit P3 order, the State Government, even though set aside the order ofthe District Collector, has directed

C.R.Neelakandan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14045 OF 2019 PETITIONER:SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED M/S.SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED, FORMELY (M/S. SYNTHITE PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS (P) LIMITED),HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THEKKEKKARA MANSIONS 2ND … reconsideration of the order, which is the challenge in the writ petition filed by the owner of the property.3. In Exhibit P3 order, the State Government, even though set aside the order ofthe District Collector, has directed

Krishna Electrical Industries Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)82TTJ(Delhi)575

the firm as a whole. Therefore, it cannot be said that it was a case of exchange of property or transfer of property from one person to another person.3.5 In the case of Sunil Siddarthbhai v. CIT … converted into a company under the name and style of KEI. Industries Ltd. This conversion was made as limited company under Chapter IX of the Companies Act. As a result of the formula of the aforesaid company,

Amol S/O Late Bhalchandra Joshi and ors. Vs. Deorao S/O Santoshrao Bho ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

non-testamentary instruments which acknowledge the receipt or payment of any consideration on account of the creation, declaration, assignment, limitation or extinction of any such right, title or interest; and(d) leases of immovable property from year to year,

Amol S/O Late Bhalchandra Joshi and ors.Vs. Deorao S/O Santoshrao Bhon ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

non-testamentary instruments which acknowledge the receipt or payment of any consideration on account of the creation, declaration, assignment, limitation or extinction of any such right, title or interest; and(d) leases of immovable property from year to year,

Commissioner of Income Tax Vii and Another Vs. Shri Karan Khandelwal a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

4. A Collaboration Agreement dated 28.08.2002 was then executed between Span Properties Pvt. Ltd. and JMD Promoters Private Limited, through its Managing Director Shri Sunil Bedi. Under this MoU, JMD Promoters Private Limited agreed to construct a … FAR while changing land use and accorded necessary approvals and that is why the market value of the property had gone down on account of permissible built up area having been substantially reduced. We have carefully perused

Laxmi NaraIn and ors. Vs. Firm Ram Kumar Suraj Bux and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38, 39, 73 and 63 - Order 21, Rule 52

Reported in : AIR1971Raj30; 1970(3)WLN372

of the cause of action arises (Section 20). Section 16 lays down that suits for recovery of immovable property shall be instituted in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situated. Section … court executing a decree. It was pointed out in this decision that the general rule relating to the limitations over the powers of an executing court from the point of view of its territorial jurisdiction was subject

Ravanammal vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

of 1.66 Hectares and consequently not to take action against the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the stiuated at No. 3/54, 3/34, 3/5, 3/52, No.3/37, No.3/8, No.3/18 V.O.C Street, Thirumalai Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai … prepare a chart and register pointing out the boundaries of the Lake for the purpose of identifying the limits of Lake as per Section (6) of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act,