Advanced Search Results
Kedar Nath Yadav Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-2016
Land Acquisition
by the High Court of Calcutta, wherein the Writ Petitions filed challenging the proceedings of the acquisition of land to an extent of about 1000 acres within the mouzas Gopalnagar, Singherberi, Beraberi, Khaserberi and Bajemelia, P.S. Singur,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. Alaska
US Supreme Court
Jun-19-1997
Land Acquisition
19, 1997 This suit involves a dispute between the United States and Alaska over the ownership of submerged lands along the State's Arctic Coast. The Alaska Statehood Act expressly provides that the federal Submerged Lands Act applies
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinstitute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences Vs. Govt. of Nct of D ...
Delhi
Mar-05-2012
Land Acquisition
filed by IHBAS against the Government of NCT of Delhi (Secretary-Land and Building Deptt.); Delhi Development Authority and Land and Development Department, Office of the Ministry of Works and Housing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi as defendant nos.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...
Mumbai
Oct-14-2014
Land Acquisition
the Respondents above-named are bound and liable to pay to the Petitioner due and proper compensation for the land in question, namely, land bearing Survey No.51/0 of Village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel District Raigad admeasuring about 157 acres
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Erappa Shetty Vs. The Chief Secretary
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjappagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHanumanthappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS THE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR A FREE AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »