Advanced Search Results

The Management Vs. Commissioner of Labour

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17-B, 25-T, 33(2)(b), 11-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

represented by its Managing Director. W.P.(MD)No.8078 of 2007 is filed against the order of the Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation), Chennai (wrongly shown as the Commissioner of Labour, Chennai in the cause title) made in Approval Petition … an office bearer of the union. The correspondence that the union had with the Government related to the industrial dispute between the second respondent's trade union and the corporation. Only an appeal was made to the Hon'ble

Siemens Ltd. and Another Vs. Siemens Employees Union and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 30(2); Industrial Disputes Act - Section 9(A); Constitution of India - Article 14

no.1. It is recognized under the provisions of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter, referred to as the Maharashtra Act). Respondent no. 2, the pro forma respondent, represents … company, its Chief Manager for personnel (appellant no. 2) and its Works Manager (respondent no.2) before the learned Industrial Court, Thane, Maharashtra. The trade union impugned a notification dated 3rd May, 2007 issued by the company for

Madras Corporation Red Flag Union Vs. the Govt.of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 12(3), 9-A

under challenge. 2. Even during the pendency of that Writ Petition, another trade Union by name Corporation of Labour Union with Registration No.2601 represented by its President filed the second Writ Petition No.1322 of 2007 claiming for … Unions, the Corporation was forced to absorb these workers pursuant to the settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act. As most of the workers were not recruited for any service in the Corporation, the Corporation

Man Singh Vs. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Section 31; Constitution of India - Articles 227, 136

On those allegations he raised an industrial dispute. The appropriate Government referred the dispute for adjudication before the Labour Court, Gurgaon, vide order dated December 4, 2006. The reference is in the following terms: “Whether the termination

Management of Malini Textiles Private Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer and o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Section 33-C(2); Tamil Nadu Industrial Employment Rules - Rule 48(2)

the 2nd respondent (C.Rajaraman) raised an industrial dispute regarding his non-employment and the matter was taken before the Labour Court, Coimbatore as I.D.No.466 of 2002. The Labour Court set the petitioner management as ex parte on 14.10.2003

M.Anjappa Vs. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Its Secretary to Government.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

by filing counter, by submitting that the Special Rules for Tamilnadu Industries Subordinate Service amended vide G.O.Ms.1248, Industries, Labour & Commerce Department dated 31.3.1958, wherein the cadre was divided into five categories, which reads as under: Category … Operatives.2. The impugned order reads as under:Office of the Director of SericultureSalem 636 001Rc.No.7477/E2/2011 Dated :16.8.2011MEMOSub: Estt- Tamilnadu Industries Subordinate ServiceAsst. Inspectors of Sericulture  requested to fixtheir pay on par with Thiru M.Sivasankar, AsInspector of Sericulture  who

S.M.Syed Mohammed Buhari Vs. the Sub Registrar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 71 to 76; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Constitution of India - Article 226; Registration Rules - Rule 55

the said rule, a registering authority shall not accept for registration any document or service agreement evidencing bonded labour or transaction constituting an offence under any law or opposed to public policy or morality. Therefore, except the … of the Registration Act, 1908, has been succinctly putforth by the Honourable Apex Court in SURAJ LAMP & INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. vs. STATE OF HARAYANA [(2009) 7 SCC 363]. The following passage is apposite: “18.Registration provides safety

G.R.Swamy Vs. the Presiding Officer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

by order dated 17.2.2005. Thereafter, the petitioner had raised an industrial dispute under Section 2(A) before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Chennai. As the said officer after conciliation proceedings could not bring about settlement, he sent a

Commissioner of Central Excrcise Faridabad Vs. Ms Food and Healthcare.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35L(b), 11A, 38A, 4 (1)(b); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q, 209A; Central Excise Rules, 2001 - Rule 25(1), 26, 9(2); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 2,; Companies Act, 1956 - clause (41), Section 2,

itself given a specific finding that the status of the Assessee was not better than that of hired labour and Heinz is the manufacturer, the duty is leviable only on the manufacturer. Being aggrieved by the dismissal … M/s Ujagar Prints & Ors. (III) Vs. Union of India & Ors.3 (for short Ujagar Prints (III)), Empire Industries Limited & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.4 and Pawan Biscuits Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of

The Commissioner Vs. K.Balu and ors

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Section 2(A)(2), 12(4); Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 71 to 77(A); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Commissioner. In these writ petitions, the challenge is made to a common Award passed by the second respondent Labour Court, Madurai, made in I.D.Nos.30/2003 to 39/2003 and I.D.No.69/2003, dated 07.10.2008. By the impugned Award, the Labour Court, … is a catalyst to reach the ladder of justice. The philosophy of welfare State and social justice is amply reflected in large number of judgments of this Court, various High Courts, National and State Industrial Tribunals involving