Advanced Search Results

Newslaundry Media Pvt Ltd vs Tv Today Network Ltd and Ors & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

once an intellectual property claim forms part of a suit, any other reliefs “arising out of” the same intellectual property rights can also be tried by the Commercial Court.35. The learned Single Judge explained that the term “arising out … evident that the definition of a “commercial dispute” includes a wide range of matters, including disputes related to intellectual property rights (IPRs).40. Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, reads as follows: “(c) "commercial dispute" means a dispute arising

Tv Today Network Limited vs News Laundry Media Private Limited and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

once an intellectual property claim forms part of a suit, any other reliefs “arising out of” the same intellectual property rights can also be tried by the Commercial Court.35. The learned Single Judge explained that the term “arising out … evident that the definition of a “commercial dispute” includes a wide range of matters, including disputes related to intellectual property rights (IPRs).40. Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, reads as follows: “(c) "commercial dispute" means a dispute arising

Caesar Park Hotels and Resorts Inc. Vs. Westinn Hospitality Services L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR1999Mad396; (1998)IIIMLJ172

the Honourable Judge of the Supreme Court made in an article published in : AIR1997SC2763 under the caption 'Intellectual Property Rights -- The Indian Experience' after referring to the Whirlpool case, : (1996)5SCC714 , as given below :-- 'It … mark as such has not been registered in India. The rapidly gtowing international trade makes it imperative that intellectual property rights arc properly recognised and managed in different countries of the globe. National protection is no longer adequate to

Director of Income Tax Vs. Infrasoft Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

further noted that the licence agreement between the Assessee Company and its customers stipulated that all copyrights and intellectual property rights in the software and copies made by the ======================================================================= licensee were owned by Infrasoft and only Infrasoft had … defined in Explanation 2 to Section 9(i)(vi) to include consideration for transfer of ======================================================================= either one or more intellectual property rights mentioned therein and as such, there was no scope for an argument that computer software was not fully

Cub Pty Ltd. vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition pertains to the situs or location of intellectual property rights such as logos, brands, trademarks, which are capital assets, but intangible in nature. In terms of Section 9(1)(i) … 1961. Insofar as the income attributable to the grant of perpetual and irrevocable licence in relation to Brewing Intellectual Property rights is concerned, the same is not liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. The

M/S Amazon Development Centre India Private Limited vs Additional Comm ...

Court : Karnataka

Intellectual Property. "Intellectual Property" shall mean and include, but not limited to: (a) any and all - 13 -intellectual property rights, owned or otherwise held or Recipient as rights to use, whether existing under intellectual property, unfair competition or … addendum to this Agreement, a purchase order, or separate contract, as may be appropriate. Without limiting the foregoing, "Intellectual Property rights between the parties are set forth on Exhibit A hereto.2.1 Intellectual Property. "Intellectual Property" shall mean and include,

Hcl Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

popularly and commercially understood. It represents consideration received by a person, who is the owner of the intangible intellectual property rights or know-how for permitting a third person to use or the right to use the said rights or … we hold that the payments by HCL to ADC were for mere right to use or to use intellectual property rights/know-how and not for transfer of full ownership, the said payment to ADC would be taxable in India as

institute for Inner Studies and ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

President of the plaintiff No.1. After the death of the Master, the entire estate of the Master, including intellectual property rights of all over the world, has devolved upon the plaintiff Nos.7 to 10 under the operation of law. … plaintiff No.3 is the supreme authority to conduct courses to teach Pranic Healing. The plaintiff thus claims the intellectual property rights in the Pranic Healing Techniques/ Modern Pranic Healing Techniques. CASE SET UP AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS BY PLAINTIFFS4 The

Infosys Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

at the seller’s premises or the purchaser’s premises would not be of any relevance. The copyright or the intellectual property rights of such modification also vests with the seller. 47 22. In the case of deemed sale or transfer … to BANK, as listed in Annexure I and any Addendums thereto signed by both the parties, and the intellectual property rights for which are owned by Infosys.42. Clause 5 of the agreement speaks about the “technical support”. It provides

Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr vs.amit Kotak & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

to inform users not to host, display, upload, modify, publish, transmit, update or share information that infringes the intellectual property rights of any party as well as to take steps to avoid sale of such infringing products; (xii) that … No.2 eBay that several others who were similarly offering for sale and selling water purifier systems infringing the intellectual property rights of the plaintiffs had been injuncted by the Courts; (xv) that though the defendant No.2 eBay in its