Advanced Search Results

National Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Sinitha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 161, 162(2), 166, 163A, 140 to 144, 167; Workmen

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT821; 2012(1)KLJ69; 2012(1)LW120; 2012(1)MLJ1164; 2012(2)SCC356; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)659; 2012(2)SCJ227; AIR2012SCW10; 2012(1)TNMAC1

on the following day. George K., survived. The motorcycle was insured with the petitioner herein i.e. the National Insurance Company Limited. A valid act only policy, at the time of the occurrence, is admitted. 2. On 18.8.2000 … following day. George K., survived. The motorcycle was insured with the petitioner herein i.e. the National Insurance Company Limited. A valid act only policy, at the time of the occurrence, is admitted. 2. On 18.8.2000 the complainants,

Bhimavva and ors. Vs. Shankar Alias Adya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor VehiclesLabour and Industrial

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 147(1) and 167; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ235Kant

1800 of 1998. The question that arises for determination before this Bench is the extent of liability of Insurance Company to indemnify the owner under the Act Policy against the compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal … holding that insurer is liable to indemnify the owner against the compensation awarded by the Tribunal subject to limitation prescribed under Section 95(2) of the Act and not limited to amount payable under the Compensation Act, if

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Gurmukh Bhirani

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bhatapara, District Raipur on 20.01.2010. The said vehicle was insured by the appellant (O.P.) on 21.01.2010 and the insurance policy No. was 191190/31/2010/3325. As, on 20.01.2010 the said vehicle was registered in the name of Bholaram Chandrawanshi, … ignored that the respondent (complainant) has suppressed some material fact. He placed reliance on Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through : Manager Law vs. Ajay Dharmaraj (Appeal No.FA/12/235) decided by this Commission on 13.09.2012; Bajaj Allianz General

G.V. Venkatesh Babu and anr. Vs. Krishna Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2002ACJ1998; [2002(93)FLR126]; ILR2002KAR812; 2002(2)KarLJ277

there was no loss of any service or emoluments. They made a reference to a case of National Insurance Company Limited v. R. Vishnu, wherein this Court observed that the question as to whether a particular claimant … which have not been admitted or established'.9. In the recent decision in Amar Nath Singh v. Continental Constructions Limited, the Apex Court had an occasion to deal with Section 4(1)(c) of the Act read with Schedule I

Rajanna Vs. Proprietor, Cupid Food Product

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4(1); Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : 2003ACJ250; [2003(96)FLR446]; ILR2002KAR1256; 2002(6)KarLJ191

there was no loss of any service or emoluments. They made a reference to a case of National Insurance Company Limited v. R. Vishnu, wherein this Court observed that the question as to whether a particular claimant … have not been admitted or established'. 21. In the recent decision in Amar Nath Singh v. Continental Constructions Limited, the Apex Court had an occasion to deal with Section 4(1)(c) of the Act read with Schedule I

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.rajender Awasthi & Ors (United Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

+ + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 … + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

+ + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 … + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.united India Insurance Company Limited ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

+ + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 … + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M. China Samba and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304A, 337 and 338

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD455; 2008(3)ALT558

the vehicle, which is a goods vehicle, as coolies for loading and unloading purposes of the bricks. The insurance policy covers clearly the risk of six coolies in addition to the paid driver and cleaner of the … passengers, in addition to the driver and conductor. The plea of the insurer was that its liability was limited to the claim of 38 passengers. Under the circumstances, the Apex Court was of the view thus:As this

Balram Prasad Vs. Kunal Saha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

of the annual income as laid down in the decision of this Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Jashuben & Ors[2].. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the appellant- doctors … Motor Accident Claims Tribunal have unlimited jurisdiction. In the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 there is a provision for limitation of 2 years for filing of complaint under Section 24-A of the Act and there is no limitation