Advanced Search Results

Sirur Municipality, (Ghodnadi) District Poona Vs. the Workmen, Sirur M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(14)

Reported in : AIR1961Bom75; (1960)62BOMLR965; ILR1961Bom415; (1960)IILLJ657Bom

was contended that none of the categories of the employees was engaged in an activity, which was an industry within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, the petitioner admitted before the Tribunal, that the Municipal fitter,

Corporation of City of Nagpur Vs. N.H. Mujumdar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 - Sections 2(10), 2(11), 2(12), 2(13), 2(14) and 39; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 39; Constitution of India - Article 226; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 59(2)

Reported in : AIR1958Bom231; (1958)60BOMLR180; ILR1958Bom493

or prolonged hardship to a large section of the community is likely to be caused, or (iii) the industry concerned is likely to be seriously affected and employment curtailed by reason of the continuance of the dispute.'

Mafatlal Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. Mafatlal Engineering Industri ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ657Bom; 1991(1)MhLj1359

between the 1st Respondent, which claims to have been the original representative of the employees in this particular industry and which, admittedly, is a registered trade union on the one hand, and the management of the Company

P.M. Murugappa Mudaliar Rathina Mudaliar and Sons (by M. Muniswami, Pa ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 10(1)(C), 12(5) and 18

Reported in : (1965)ILLJ489Kant; (1965)2MysLJ73

terminated by the petitioner, the dispute, even assuming that the business carried on by the petitioner is an industry, it was an individual dispute and not an industrial dispute as defined in S. 2(k) of the Act.

Management of theatre Sanjaya Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bonus Act - Sections 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 10, 10(1), 10(5), 12, 12(1), 12(4), 12(5), 20(2), 22, 25F, 25FFF, 31, 33, 33(1), 33(2), 33A and 38

Reported in : ILR1984KAR539; (1984)IILLJ400Kant

to the Government to refer an industrial dispute whether existing or apprehended between management and workmen of an industry and that such power could be exercised at any time. Having regard to the force of the language

Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. U.P. Government and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 245 and 309

Reported in : AIR1954All705

Gorakhpur, for the re-instatement of Ram Nath Koeri on 16-6-1948. That application was made under the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act (U. P. Act 28 of 1947) read with the order of the State Government contained in

Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1960Ori205

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) means :'(i) in relation to any industrial dispute concerning an industry carried oh by Or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway Company or concerning

Punjab Anand Lamp Employees Union Vs. Punjab Anand Lamp Industry Ltd. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 11A and 12

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ338P& H

the dispute sought to be raised, if referred for adjudication, will have grave adverse consequences on the entire industry in the region. (4) In the garb of examination of prima facie issue of existence or apprehension of

Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate Vs. the Management of Dimakuchi Tea Es ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Indian Contract Act - Sections 56

Reported in : AIR1958SC353; (1958)ILLJ500SC; [1958]1SCR1156

time stated : "S. 2 (s): " Workman " means any person employed (including an apprentice) in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual or clerical work for hire or reward and includes, for the

The Corporation of the City of Nagpur Vs. Its Employees Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Administrative Law; Public Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 - Sections 2(14) and 39; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 333; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1960SC675; (1960)ILLJ523SC

filed a statement before the Industrial Court, inter alia, on the ground that the corporation was not an industry as defined by the Act. On February 13, 1957, the Industrial Court made a preliminary order holding that