Advanced Search Results

Surajdeo Singh @ Surya Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Sessions Judge. Bhagalpur in Sessions Case No. 241 of 1981/4 of 1986 convicting him under Sections 302/109 of Indian Penai Code (in short 'IPC') and 302/34, IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence

Lalji Haridas Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 5, 5(7), 5(8), 37, 37(1), 37(2), 37(3) and 37(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 190, 195, 195(1), 195(2), 480 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 20, 193, 196, 228 and 471; Constitution of India - Article 134(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Registration Act, 1877; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948; Workmen

Reported in : AIR1964SC1154; (1964)66BOMLR460; 1964CriLJ249; [1964]52ITR423(SC); 1965MHLJ21(SC); [1964]6SCR700

in the affirmative. That is the plain effect of s. 37(4) of the Act. Section 193 of the Indian Penai Code. with which we are directly concerned in the present appeal provides for punishment for intentionally giving false evidence.

Rajaram Keshoprasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1962CriLJ688

ORDERN.M. Golvalker, J.1. This is an appeal by the accused challenging his conviction Under Sections 467 and 409, Indian Penai Code, by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, in Sessions Trial No. 103 of I960.2. The accused, who was

Kishan Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1989)ACC500

case came up for trial before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge. He framed the charge under Section 302, Indian Penai Code against the appellant and under Sections 302/34, Indian Penal Code against accused Jhabar Mai. Both of them denied

Major Singh Lachhman Singh Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 352 and 354

Reported in : AIR1963P& H443; 1963CriLJ390

Itself. If a different interpretation were adopted, then in dealing with an offence under Section 354 of the Indian PenaI Code, an offender could always put the prosecution to proof of the fact that the woman concerned had developed

Bachchi Singh and Another Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Indian Penai Code.

Acts : Sections 302, 392/34 of IPC.; Section 313 ,439 of Cr.P.C

to have submitted himself to the "custody" of the police officer within the meaning of S.27 of the Indian Evidence Act." In the context of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Supreme Court, in Niranjan

Zahoor Ahmad Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ978; 1974(7)WLN298

(c) of the P. C. Act is an offence distinct from the one under Section 409 of the Indian Penai Code.3. Mr. Jain appearing for the State argues that Section 409, Indian Penal Code, is the same as

Rajendra Jonko Vs. the Superintendent of Police

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 12(2) rw 13(1)(e); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(2) rw 5(1)(e); Transfer of Property Act - Section 54 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 304B; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 313,

Corruption Act reads: "Wherein any trial of an offence punishable under section 161 or section 165 of the Indian PenaI Code (or of an offence referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of sub- section (1) of section

Dhaneshwar Sah and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 379, 427, 447 and 448; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4

the compromise the above revisionists shall stand acquitted for the offence under Sections 448 and 427 of the Indian Penai Code. 3. So far the other offences are concerned, it has been submitted by the revisionist's lawyer that in

Ram Niranjan Kajaria Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1964CriLJ614

On these facts, the petitioner anrf Nattu Bhai Riwji besai were challaned Under Sections 406, 411 and 114, Indian Penai Code. The Magistrate framed a charge Under Section new, Indian Penal Code, against the petitioner. The petitioner went In