Advanced Search Results
Sawai Madhopur Oil and Pulse Industries and ors. Vs. State of Rajastha ...
Rajasthan
Aug-08-2002
Constitution
2001(3)WLC419; 2003(1)WLN255
of the aforesaid provisions have been that:(a) amended provisions are repugnant to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Code of Civil Procedure.(b) the provisions in the Amendment Act are contrary to Article 254 … C.J.1. A bunch of 75 writ petitions were filed challenging the vires of certain provisions of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). the petitioners in the respective writ petitions have
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs Pernod Ricard India Pvt Ltd Through Its Authorised Representative M ...
Delhi
May-29-2026
Land Acquisition
TO THE PETITIONER44IV. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 46V. ORDER ............................................................................................................ 46A person indulged in the liquor business not having a criminal background may, prima facie, colloquially, appear to be a contradiction in terms, but the present matter, owing to … Harneet Singh, Mr. Kunal Khanuja, Mr. Ishani Shekhar, Mr. Somil Jain & Mr. Dhruv Raman Singh, Advocates., Advs.)Versus1. EXCISE DEPARTMENT, DELHI,GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIThrough Deputy Commissioner of Excise GNCT of Delhi Department of Excise, L-Block, Vikas
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Kejriwal Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement
Supreme Court of India
Jul-12-2024
Land Acquisition
filed. On 15.12.2022, the Special Court took cognisance of the offences. The chargesheets inter alia allege that the excise policy, framed for the sale of liquor in NCT of Delhi, was a product of criminal conspiracy. It
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Karthikeyan.A.C Vs State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Feb-27-2026
to pay Rs.20,00,000/- to Anand and if he failed to do so, he would be falsely implicated in criminal cases. The complainant was again beaten up by Karthikeyan.5.Thereafter, the complainant was taken to the Government Hospital, Kuzhithurai … No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Greenways Road, Chennai - 600 028. 2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 3.The Director General of Police, Post Box No. 601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnaiah G J vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-17-2025
KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9160 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. KRISHNAIAH .G.JS/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O NO 965, 3RD CROSS … consequent charge sheet filed in C.C.No.20160/2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 14 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.2. The facts leading to the case are as under: Respondent No.2 lodged a complaint beforerespondent No.1
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-2020
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200 OF2020(@ S.L.P.(CRIMINAL)No.4178 of 2019) UNION OF INDIA ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA … and to interrogate him in connection with the investigation of economic offences, offences under the Essential Commodities Act, Excise and Customs Act, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act etc. ……” No doubt, these are all cases where express power
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNireswar Gogoi Vs. State of Assam
Guwahati
May-24-1968
Criminal
P.K. Goswami, J.1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the judgment of conviction under Section 5(a) of the Assam Opium Prohibition Act (Assam … two months, passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sibsagar in the original trial.2. The facts are very brief. The Excise Inspector of Sonari accompanied by the Assistant Excise Inspector and some constables searched the house of the petitioner,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Kumar Datta and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Nov-22-1962
ExciseCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 165, 172 and 173(4); ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Section 74 and 74(1); ;Evidence Act - Section 145
AIR1963Cal431,1963CriLJ129
made under a special statute, namely, Bengal Excise Act, the statutory provisions of Section 173 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code were not applicable and therefore the accused were not entitled to copies, as of right The … prayer made by the accused petitioners for supplying copies of statements which may have been recorded by the Excise Officer in the course of the investigation of the case, which is one under Section 120B of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhakaran Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Jan-30-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2), 13(1), 19, 19(1), 9(1), 7, 10, 11, 13 and 15; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 120B and 197; All India Service Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2A, 3 and 19(2); Cattle Tresspass Act, 1871 - Sections 20; ;Criminal Procedure Court - Sections 2, 97, 190, 197, 227, 319 and 321; All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 - Rule 3 and 5; All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rule 6, 7, 7(2) and 8; Indian Civil Administrative Service Cadre Rules, 1950; All India Services (Conditions of Service-Residuary Matters) Rules, 1960; Constitution of India - Article 312(1)
2006(1)KLT955
the petitioner was working as the Secretary, Board of Revenue (Land Revenue) and held additional charge of Secretary, Excise (Board of Revenue) for a short period. A criminal case was registered against the petitioner and 7 others
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeokinandan Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
May-14-1936
Criminal
AIR1936All753; 165Ind.Cas.701
as officers of the force who come down up to the grade of constables only. In Section 45, Criminal P.C., Act 5 of 1898, village headman, village accountant, village watchman, village owner or occupier of land and … v. Emperor 1919 46 Cal 411, and Nanhoo Sheikh Ahmed v. Emperor 1927 51 Bom 78 related to Excise Officers and not to a village chowkidar. Unfortunately in these cases the relevant sections of the Police Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »