Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: excise limitation · Page 1 of about 22,052 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2008

Narasamma Vs. Collector and District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT31

3 years and Rs. 5,000/- fine.(3) Again on 21-2-2006 in Cr. No. 144/ 2005-06 of the Proh. and Excise Station, Paderu he was found at Sarasapadu mandal limits carrying one gunny bag having about 50 Kgs. of … a lorry bearing No. AP20 T 3679, the Lorry turned turtle near 12th Mile Stone at Paderu mandal limits, later he was arrested along with others and sent to judicial custody. He was convicted by the Hon'be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1985

Kaipully Match Industries and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-13-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)(5)LC2076Tri(Delhi)

have always prevailed over all notifications issued on or after 19-6-1980 but before 23-2-1982 and all duties of excise levied, assessed or collected or purporting to have been levied, assessed or collected on or after 19-6-1980 but … the demand, in any event, in both instances, could not be enforced without reference to the period of limitation prescribed in the Central Excises and Salt Act, irrespective of the provision for retrospective application under Section 52

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2011

Jk Tyre and Industries Ltd. Rep by Its General Manager Vs. Assistant C ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-22-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: This CEA is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Arising out of Order dated 02-05-2008 Passed in Miscellaneous Order No. 119/2008, Praying that this Hon’ble … Tax Act, 1961 and it has been clearly held that, the Section comprises of two parts and the limitation of four years prescribed for exercising the power of rectification of the order applicable only where the authority

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 20 2018

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Indian Telephone Industries ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-20-2018

Subject : Service Tax

AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA C.E.A.Nos.30/2017 & 62/2017 C/W C.E.A.No.66/2016 C.E.A.Nos.30/2017 & 62/2017 BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BENGALURU-I COMMISSIONERATE2D FLOOR, SHIVAJINAGAR BUS STAND COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 051. (By Mr. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) AND: M/S. INDIAN TELEPHONE … COMMISSIONERATE2D FLOOR, SHIVAJINAGAR BUS STAND COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 051. (By Mr. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) AND: M/S. INDIAN TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES LIMITED DOORAVANINAGAR BENGALURU-560 016. …APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT (By Mr. K. PARAMESWARAN & Mr. KRISHNAMURTHY P, ADVS.,) THESE C.E.A.s ARE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1986

Music India Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act; Central Excises Act - Sections 11B, 11B(1) and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR8; 1987(11)ECC46

at Kandivli in Bombay where gramophone records and music cassettes are manufactured. The gramophone records are liable to excise duty under Tariff Item No. 37A, while music cassettes under Tariff Item No. 59. The petitioners cleared the … commencing from January 1, 1977 to May 26, 1980 on the ground that the claim was barred by limitation as contemplated by Section 11B(1) of the Act. The petitioners have amended the petition to challenge the legality

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2012

Madura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-03-2012

Subject : Excise

is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate … and in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. ITC Limited, (2005) 179 ELT 15 (SC), interest was payable for the period commencing from three months after the final

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2012

…appellant/Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata Iv ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-03-2012

Subject : Excise

G.A.No.3162 of 2011 CEXA No.1 of 2008 In the High Court at Calcutta Special Jurisdiction (Central Excise) Original Side Present : The Hon’ble Justice J.N.Patel, Chief Justice And The Hon’ble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti Madura … Present : The Hon’ble Justice J.N.Patel, Chief Justice And The Hon’ble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti Madura Coats Private Limited …Appellant/Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata IV Commissionerate …Respondent For the Appellant For the Respondent Heard on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2012

Madura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-03-2012

Subject : Excise

is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate … and in view of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. ITC Limited, (2005) 179 ELT 15 (SC), interest was payable for the period commencing from three months after the final

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2018

M/S. Karnataka Power Transmission Vs. Principal Commissioner Of

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-22-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED) (By Mr. V. RAGHURAMAN, ADV.,) AND:1. ... PETITIONER PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, LTU JSS TOWERS, 100 FT RING ROAD BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085.2.3. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE … OCTOBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.62960/2016 (T-TAR)BETWEEN : M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED NO.118, KAVERI BHAVAN K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009 (REPRESENTED BY SMT. RUTH GEORGE MIRAJKAR D/O GEORGE MIRAJKAR AGED ABOUT53YEARS

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2016

K. Sreenivasan Vs. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribun ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Dec-02-2016

Subject : Excise

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944, against the final order No.1133/11, dated 07.10.2011 in A.No.E/432/2011.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The appellant is … would disclose that based on the intelligence gathered by the Officers of HPU, Madurai, that M/s.Paragon Paper Private Limited, 543/2, Perumal Goundanpatti, B.Ammapatty, Theni District (In short "PPPL") are selling the Duplex Boards to the safety matches

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial