Advanced Search Results

Adreena Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excsse

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(13)ECC155

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Adreena Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1987)(11)LC97Tri(Delhi)

De necessary to set out the facts of the case.2. On 10.9.1971 the Preventive Staff of the Central Excise Division, Faridabad, visited the premises of the appellants. They seized certain woollen yarn on the ground that in … that the process of dyeing duty-paid yarn was not manufacture as it did not bring into existence a commercial commodity with distinct name, character and use. He endeavoured to distinguish the decision in Lal Woollen and Silk

M. Sultan Pillai and Sons, a Registered Partnership Firm Vs. the Union ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 30

Reported in : AIR1963Mad365

letter, the plaintiff again wrote on 11-9-1956 as per Ex. A. 14, setting out the price including the excise duty of the 55 bags of tobacco and requesting the Chief Commercial Superintendent to settle the claim. In

Indian Telephone Indus. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4), 11D, 12

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT68(Bom)

hair dyes amongst other products. Respondent No. 1 to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 ('the Act'' for short) whose notices and decision of … be understood in technical matters or scientific laboratories but in the sense which the people dealing in or commercially conversant with the items would attribute to them. In Paragraph 10 of this judgment, the learned Judge has

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. D.G. Ahire and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR65

hair dyes amongst others products. Respondent No. 1 to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('the Act' for short) whose notices and decision of … be understood in technical matters or scientific laboratories but in the sense which the people dealing in or commercially conversant with the items would attribute to them. In paragraph 10 of this judgment, the learned Judge has

Poonam Spark P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(92)ECC621

these two appeals, arising out of a common Order-in-Appeal No.175/C.E. /DLH/2002, dated 28-2-2002, the issue involved is whether excise duty is leviable on Water Purification and Filteration System mounted by M/s. Poonam Spark Pvt. Ltd. on a … a legal opinion from a senior Counsel, who had advised that there was no manufacture of any new commercial commodity other than the commodities which were bought and sold in a combined form; that further this issue

Kathira Match Factory and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6, 6(1A), 7, 8, 8(2), 8(2A), 8(5), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 10, 11, 12, 13 and 17; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3, 3D(1) and 16; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 3D and 7

Reported in : [1981]48STC69(Mad)

ultra vires while confirming the decision of the High Court that the levy of sales tax on the excise duty portion of the turnover is invalid in law in State of Madras v. Nataraja Mudaliar : [1968]3SCR829 … suits, decreeing the suits as prayed for with costs. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Commercial Tax Officer, Tuticorin, filed the above suits for recovery of sales tax amounts refunded to the defendants as

iti Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Binny Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1986)LC440Tri(Delhi)

were already engaged in such manufacture. It is alleged that the appellant company had failed to pay appropriate excise duty on the tarpaulins manufactured in their Agencies Division from the period June 1980 to February 1985, thus … 88. He has further referred to the judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of Satyavijaya Commercial Co. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State 55 STC 186, in his favour.7. Appellants have specially emphasised