Advanced Search Results

Hannah Vs. Larche

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

to inquire and the adverse material which is proposed to be presented;" that a person adversely affected by evidence or testimony given at a public hearing could "appear and testify or file a sworn statement in his

Murphy Vs. Waterfront Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

a federal prosecution against him, and such use of compelled testimony or its fruits, as distinguished from independent evidence, by the Federal Government must be proscribed. Feldman v. United States, 322 U. S. 487 , overruled. Pp.

Rock Vs. Arkansas

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

as instrumental in obtaining particular types of information. Moreover, hypnotically refreshed testimony is subject to verification by corroborating evidence and other traditional means of assessing accuracy, and inaccuracies can be reduced by procedural safeguards such as the

Mukesh and Anr Vs. State for Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the factual score and the investigation have to withstand the test of reliability and acceptability. The appreciation of evidence brought on record requires to be appositely scrutinized to adjudge the fact whether the appellants are guilty of

Dasu and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 154(1) and 313

Reported in : 1985(2)BomCR168

bamboo stick (Art. 1). His defence is also of total denial. None of the accused led any defence evidence.7. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, on considering the evidence adduced by the prosecution, found that the prosecution satisfactorily

Dasu and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1933

bamboo stick (Article 1). His defence is also .of total dental. None of the accused led any defence evidence.7. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, on considering the evidence adduced by the prosecution, found that the prosecution satisfactorily

S.J. Chaudhary Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Evidence Federal Rules - Rules 104 and 702

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT673

29.9.1982, in tourist bungalow Naldera Complex. He was allotted hut No. 6 vide permit No. Ex.PW-60/A.25. From the evidence of the aforenoted witnesses, the prosecution intended to establish the inquisitive conduct of the appellant in enquiring about

R.Santosh Kumar vs State (Nct of Dlehi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

pleaded innocence. He examined three witnesses in his defence.15. Upon conclusion of trial and on appreciation of the evidence onrecord, the learned trial court vide judgment dated 06th April, 2002 convicted the appellant for offences under Sections

Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. Vs. Hillmon

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

an affidavit made by him in direct conflict with his testimony, and the affidavit be subsequently put in evidence by the opposite party without limitation as to its purpose in so doing, it becomes a part of

Haynes Vs. Washington

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

on a charge of robbery, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment. Over his timely objection, there was admitted in evidence a written confession obtained after he had been held incommunicado for 16 hours and had been told that