Advanced Search Results

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

RAGHAVACHARYULU, ADVOCATE FOR D.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE.2. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, BELLARY DIVISION, BELLARY. ... RESPONDENTS (BY PROF: RAVIVARMA KUMAR, … GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 &2) ***** -:4. :- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NOTIFICATION ANN-A THE NOTIFICATION DT.27.8.08, IS ULTRA VIRES THE PROVISION OF ARTICLE246

M. Ramasamy and Others Vs. the Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(8)MLJ628

the writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records issued by the 2nd respondent and quash G.O.Ms.No.209 Environment and Forests (EC1) Department dated 31.12.2011, in so far as it orders payment of compensation to the members … (Prayer in W.P.No.2790 of 2012: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue the writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the sum of Rs.75

Sri Anantha Padmanabha Kini vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

HARANAHALLI., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K.V. VINOD KUMAR NAIDU., ADVOCATE) -5- AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROOM NO. 448, 4TH FLOOR, GATE NO. 2, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU … DILDAR SHIRALLI., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADIGNG APPLICANT ON IA 2/2025) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THERE-TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 26.12.2025 (ANNEXURE A) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 4, BEARING NO.

R.Sudha, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

COMPARA JUNCTION, NEAR HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS:1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS, NEW DELHI. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. … the obligations and duties conferred on the State Government, the local bodies as per the provisions of the Constitution of India. Thereupon, it was requested to take appropriate action to ensure that the resorts, hotels and restaurants

Pradeep Krishen Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 18, 20, 24, 19 to 25, 26A, 27 to 34, 35, 38 and 66; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 48A, 51A, 249, 250 and 252(1); National Park Act, 1955

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)94; AIR1996SC2040; JT1996(5)SC181; 1996(4)SCALE566; (1996)8SCC599; [1996]Supp2SCR697; 1996(2)LC414(SC)

ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, CJ.1. The petitioner, an environmentalist actuated by public interest, has filed this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the

T. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39, 41, 43, 48-A, 51-A and A (G) and 226; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Water (Prevention, Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989; The Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT193

page 741 and also to protect the rights of citizens under Article 21 and Article 51-A(G) of the Constitution of India and the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. Hence, I humbly request that the aforesaid Indian Express Report … into natural water body and the construction activity in the surrounding areas is destroying the rock formation. The environmentalists fear that most of the sewage from even the Hi-tech city will be delivered into the lake. 'If

D.S. Rana and ors. Etc. Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. and ors., Etc.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 376(1) and 376(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(8), 162, 243 and 243W; Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR2000Guj45; (2000)2GLR1036

in the show cause notice and were hazardous to health for the reasons mentioned therein and also caused environmental pollution and therefore, the petitioners should show cause as to why their licence should not be cancelled in … and unwarranted and takes away their fundamental right to do businessor trade guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.3. Special Civil Application No. 2496 of 1999 is preferred by the Gujarat Bullion Refinery, being a Partnership firm

D.D. Vyas and Others Vs. Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 7, 8 (1), (2) and (3), 9 (1) and (2), 10 (2), 13, 13 (1) and (2), 17 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Parks, Play-grounds and Open Spaces (Preservation and Regulation) Act, 1975 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 48A, 51A and 226; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act - 1976

Reported in : AIR1993All57; (1992)1UPLBEC746

it must have beautiful plants or flower beds and well maintained lawns.13. Article 48A Part IV of the Constitution enjoins upon the State to endeavour, protect and improve the environment of the country. To effectuate the directive … J.1. This writ petition is an apt example as to how the statutory object to secure preservation of environment and development of the residential colonies shown in the master plan, sought 19 be achieved by the State

Ramgopal Estates Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Managing Director K.S. Hemanth Kum ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyEnvironment

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5(A), 6, 9, 17(1), 17(2) and 17(4); Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 6 and 25; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Development and Planning Act; Land Acquisition (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 4; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 39, 47, 48A, 51A, 55, 73, 154, 162, 207, 226, 246 and 258

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC369

as to the need of the day for the right to life, viz., whether we should maintain eco-friendly environment or opt for prosperous economic growth, neither the eco-environment alone nor the industrial and economic growth by itself … statutory enquiry; and stands to the test of executive competency of the State Government, beneath the canopy of constitutional provisions, focussed sharply on the legal screen?II. THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS2.1. In the public interest litigation, W.P. No. 7613

In Re : T.n. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

was issued by the Central Government constituting the CEC as a statutory authority under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. 1 was initially constituted, inasmuch as, various enactments concerning environmental issues were enacted, so also … of the notification dated 05.09.2023. 23. In Part I of this judgment, we will first present the conception, constitution, functions, and finally the institutionalisation of the CEC. In Part II, to entrench environmental rule of law in