Advanced Search Results

Ram Murat S/O Shri Santoo Vs. Commissioner, Azamgarh Division,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 2(14) and 24; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1990 - Sections 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution (Amendment) Order, 2004 - Sections 21, 27 and 28

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3419

rejected on 27.12.05. In the remaining writ petitions the petitioners or their family members became Pradhan in the election held in the year 2005 A chart showing the date of elections, the relationship of the Pradhan with … the Control Order of 2004.10. It was contended by Sri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3629 of 2006 that the U.P. Scheduled Commodities Distribution Order, 1990 was repealed by

Radhakrishna Pillai Vs. Sasidharan Nair and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 22; Kerala Panchayats (Decision of Election Disputes) Rules, 1963 - Rules 5, 11 and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 149

Reported in : AIR1983Ker236

ORDERT. Kochu Thommen, J.1. The petitioner's election petition was dismissed by the learned Munsiff who is the competent authority under Section 22 of the Kerala … subject to the provisions of the Act and the Rules in accordance with the procedure followed by a Civil Court. Section 149 of the Code of Civil Procedure gives sufficient power to a Civil Court to allow

Rubeena vs State of Kerala Local Self Government Department

Court : Kerala

KUDUMBASHREE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 011. 3 MEMBER SECRETARY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, KUDUMBSHREE, VETTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, 4 DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, (ASST. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GENERAL) KUDUMBASHREE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505. 5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION,

Noorjahan M vs State of Kerala Local Self Government Department

Court : Kerala

KUDUMBASHREE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 011. 3 MEMBER SECRETARY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, KUDUMBSHREE, VETTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, 4 DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, (ASST. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GENERAL) KUDUMBASHREE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505. 5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION,

Yera Chandraiah Vs. District Munsif-cum-election Tribunal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 1978 - Rules 52(2), 54 and 55(1) and (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 and 10(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Gram Panchayat Act; Gram Panchayat Rules

Reported in : 1991(2)ALT188

counsel for the petitioner, firstly, that in trying the Election Petition only those provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 mentioned in Rule 55 (2) of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats (Conduct of Elections) Rules. 1978 … 22-3-1988 and the writ petitioner was declared to have been duly elected as Sarpanch of Mondigowrally. Questioning the election of the writ petitioner the fourth respondent herein filed O.P.No. 7 of 1988 under Rule 50 (2) of

Dev Prakash Balmukand Vs. Babu Ram Rewti Mal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Municipal Election Rules, 1952 - Rule 8A to 8K; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1961P& H429

appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of Mahajan, J., setting aside the entire election to the Municipal Committee of Nuh on a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The appellant is … Supreme Court was concerned with interpreting a different set of rules.8. To go back to the decision in Civil Writ No. 1176 of 1959 : (62 Pun LR 377) it appears that we did not take sufficient

Srikanta Das Adhikari Vs. Jareswar Chanda and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ElectionLimitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 - Sections 2(15), 58, 204 and 204(6); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 3, 5 and 29(2); ;Representation of People Act, 1951 - Section 81; ;West Bengal Panchayat Election Rules - Rules, 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : (2004)1CALLT317(HC)

the West Bengal Panchayat Act was filed by the petitioner being plaintiff therein challenging the result of the election on 21st June, 2003. The petitioner was ill from 12th May, 2003 to 20th June, 2003. The petitioner … application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner challenged an order passed by the learned Civil Judge [Junior Division) at Dantan, Midnapore (now West). The order passed by the learned Court below dated 14th

Union of India and ors. Vs. Madharam Verma

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1975)IILLJ160Raj; 1974(7)WLN628

of India.12. Ex. 'B' which has been relied upon by the learned single Judge is the form, of election of the 'CPC Scales.' No date is given on this but the learned Counsel for the Railway says … respect of the age of retirement:(a) In the case of staff of the Ex-States Railway who elect the CPC Scales of pay, the retirement age will be 55 years as laid down in Rule 2046(F.R. 56) of

Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice- ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

(Now re-designated Group “C”) -290-EB- in Civil/Elect. and ment of in Civil/ as Junior Engineer 380/- Mech.Engin- departmental Elect/Mech (Civil)/(Elect/Mech) (Now revised eering with two candidates Engineering as R s.425- with two years who possess candidates 15-500

Duryodhan Vs. Sitaram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951- Sections 90, 90(1), 90(2), 90(3), 92, 98, 99, 109, 110, 116A and 116B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 17

Reported in : AIR1970All1

an election petition had the power to dismiss the election petition under Order 9, Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code for default of appearance of the election-petitioner and also to restore it in a proper case … of this Court reported in Vishwanath Prasad v. Malkhan Singh Sharma, : AIR1964All181 and B. P. Maurya v. Election Tribunal, 1964 All LJ 155 on the question whether the Election Tribunal while hearing an election petition had