Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Service Vs. Nithesh Estates Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Order No.21332/2015 dated 16-07-2015 in Appeal No.ST/1854/2010-DB passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore vide … Customs Vs. Nithesh Estates Ltd., 4/28 3. The learned Tribunal, Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CSTAT) by its impugned Order

M/S. Madhucon Granites Pvt. Ltd. Shri N. Krishnaiah Vs. Cce, Hyderabad

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

the Notification No 37/2000-CE and parallel condition contained in the Customs Notification No 58/2000 and 52/2003. From the communication dated 27.9.2005 … were removed to VGPL. As per Rule 100E of Central Excise Rules, no excisable goods shall be removed from an EOU

Sobhagmal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(1); Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1950 - Rules 14(2) and 16

Reported in : AIR1954Raj207

satisfactory. He was suspended from service by the Assistant Commissioner, Customs & Excise, Jaipur, and gave over charge on the 11th June, 1949.

Metal Weld Electronics Vs. Cest Tax Appellate Tribunal

Court : Chennai

have been filed challenging the interlocutory orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for brevity, "the CESTAT") regarding … CESTAT by framing the following question of law: "Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in directing the

Ali Vs. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Court : US Supreme Court

respect of the assessment or collection of any tax or customs duty, or the detention of any … property by any … of any … property by any officer of customs or excise or any other law enforcement officer,” §2680(c). Upon his transfer

The Collector of Customs Vs. Madras Electric Castings P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Custom

Reported in : (1994)1MLJ664

the writ petition and issued the following direction to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal:Taking the above into consideration, I … the Collector is appealable and an appeal lies to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT) under Section

Collector of Customs, Madras Vs. Madras Electro Castings P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129A, B and E; Cegat (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41

Reported in : 1994(45)ECC99; 1994(71)ELT646(Mad)

the writ petition and issued the following directions to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal : 'Taking the above into … the Collector is appealable and an appeal lies to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) under Section 129A of

N. Ramachandra Reddy and Others Vs. the Union of India Rep. by Its Sec ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

on commissionerate-wise seniority. On such representation, the Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad Zone, who is the cadre controlling

Neo Intex Mills Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Cus., Tuticorin

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 1996(88)ELT343(Mad)

by the same, the petitioner-company preferred two appeals before the Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal, Sought Zonal Bench at Madras … petitioner is that in spite of the orders of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Sought Zonal Bench at Madras,

Southern Asbestos Cement Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in : (1991)38ITD449(Mad.)

should be reduced from the closing stock valuation merely because customs/excise duty had actual y been paid by the assessee during … well established accounting principles and trading practice, rightly included the customs/excise duty component. The assessee's case is that it had been