Advanced Search Results

Minerals and Metals Trading Corpn. of India Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27 and 154; ;Contract Act - Section 72; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226

Reported in : 1992(40)ECC269,1992(58)ELT548(Cal)

the part of the Minerals & Metals Trading Corporation of India Ltd. for return or refund from the Customs Authorities of a sum of Rs. 20,97,487.35 on the ground that the same represents overpaid duty. The writ … held by public Respondents who are State or other authority within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Mr. Bajoria has stated that such an enforcement, or Mandamus directing return of money, under circumstances

Chinubhai Kalidas and Brothers Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108, 123, 123(1), 123(2) and 135(1)

Reported in : 1995(77)ELT814(Guj); (1987)1GLR147

this Court for appropriate writs, orders and directions to quash and set aside the order of the Collector, Customs, Ahmedabad-respondent No. 2 herein dated February 25/27, 1986 rejecting the Petitioner's application for grant of licence under Regulation … Mehta, J.1. The Petitioner firm by this Petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has moved this Court for appropriate writs, orders and directions to quash and set aside the

In the Matter of Manuel theodore D'Souza

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Gurdian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 10, 13(3), 14, 15, 16.1, 16.3, 19(1), 21, 24, 25, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38(2), 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 49, 51, 53(1), 73, 77, 123, 141, 154, 162, 166, 225, 226, 253 and 356; Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 39; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 27; Adoption of Children Act, 1980; Chritian Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1995; Maharashtra Adoption Act, 1995; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 25(2); International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 - Article 17; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Judicature Act, 1861; Bhopal Gas Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985; Guar

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR244; II(2000)DMC292

the face of the divisions and visible barricades put up by the sensitive tribal people valuing their own customs, traditions and usages, judicially enforcing on them the principles of personal law applicable to others, on an elitist … 1956. A question immediately arose,whether a civilised State committed to the Rule of law, governed by a written Constitution and signatory to International Conventions on the Rights of a child, could deny to a section of its

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sir Shadi Lal Sugar and General Mills Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35(2), 35A, 36 and 40

Reported in : AIR1980All379; 1981(8)ELT210(All)

months from the date of such decision or order, appeal therefrom to the Central Board of Excise and Customs constituted under the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963 (LIV of 1963), or, in such cases as the … or reference from the decision of the Tribunals. (4) When a provision is already declared unconstitutional or the constitutionality of any provision is to be challenged, a suit is open. A writ of certiorari may include a

Mahboob Hasan and anr. Vs. Ram Bharosey Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19 and 19(5)

Reported in : AIR1966All271

Oak, J. 1. The following two questions of law have been referred to us:-- 1. Whether a custom of pre-emption is void under Article 13 of the Constitution irrespective of the fact whether it gives a

State of Kerala and Others Vs. fr.william Fernandez Etc Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

as not 11 to interfere with the Union's Legislative power with respect to the import and export across Customs Frontiers (Entry 41 of List I) and the duties of Customs including Export Duty (Entry 83 of List … and State of Jharkhand, the relevant provisions of which statutes shall be noticed hereinafter. 6 3. A nine­Judge constitution Bench in Jindal Stainless vs. State of Haryana and another, 2016 (11) Scale 1, had answered several questions

M/s.G.G.Steels Vs Union of India

Court : Chennai

of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) North Block, New Delhi- 110 001.2. The Director General of Foreign Trade, Udyog Bhavan, H-Wing, Gate No.2, Moulana … Road, New Delhi- 110 011. Respondent(s)Prayer in W.P.No.6840 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the 2nd Respondent in

Memphis Light, Gas and Water Div. Vs. Craft

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

in a case of this kind does not comport with constitutional requirements when it does not advise the customer of the availability of an administrative procedure for protesting a threatened termination of utility services as unjustified, and … Pp. 436 U. S. 12 -22. (a) Notice in a case of this kind does not comport with constitutional requirements when it does not advise the customer of the availability of an administrative procedure for protesting a

Oklahoma City Vs. Tuttle

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

with accepted police practice that the jury could infer from the killing alone that the city's policies and customs concerning the training of police were grossly deficient, and were to blame for the incident. Second, respondent hoped … U.S.C. § 1983 against the officer and petitioner, alleging that their actions had deprived her husband of certain constitutional rights. With respect to the liability of petitioner city, the trial judge informed the jury that petitioner could

Suaibo Ibow Casamma Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR64; 1995(80)ELT762(Bom)

ORDER1. This case presents a picture of total indifference on the part of the Customs Officer to the basic provisions and fundamental rights dealing with the detention of an accused in police custody … clear breach of the fundamental rights of an accused enshrined under Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India. In is all the more unfortunate that this should have occurred in a case concerned with