Advanced Search Results

C.J. Cadd Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1923All598; 73Ind.Cas.508

was right and to avoid loss to the owner. If the payments were made and accepted to prevent crminal proceedings this is a vindictive prosecution by the Motor Traders Limited because they have failed to get their

Sawminatha thevan Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Subject : Crminal

Reported in : 14Ind.Cas.767

ORDERSundara Aiyar, J.1. The conviction in this case cannot be sustained. The accused merely stated that he suspected the complainant of theft and mentioned the facts on which his suspicion was based. Section 211, Indian Penal...

In Re: Gur Dayal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All216

Robert Stuart, C.J.1. In the present case Gur Dayal, the applicant to us in revision, had been charged and tried before the Joint Magistrate of the First Class under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code...

Ranavajubha Gumansingh Vs. Rana Ketubhai Gumansingh and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ686; (1986)2GLR1407

the purpose of Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 195, the Court means a Civil, Revenue or Crminal Court and the said term also includes a Tribunal constituted by or under a Central, Provincial or State

Babu Alias Om Prakash and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(1)WLN454

I.S. Israni, J.1. This S.B. Crminal appeal under Section 374(2), Cr.PC has been filed against the judgment and order dated 1st April, 1981, passed

In Re: L.N. Mukerjee and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 177 and 180

Reported in : AIR1961Mad126; (1960)2MLJ340

concealment of the person known to have been kidnapped. Upon the very same logic where the offence of crminal conspiracy occurs, which is an offence solely by reason of its relation to some other act which is

(Thithi) Suryanarayana Vs. Thota Simhadri

Court : Chennai

Subject : Crminal

Reported in : AIR1934Mad664a; 152Ind.Cas.481

ORDERPandrang Row, J.1. Both the Courts below found, that the warrant while executing which the process-server was resisted, was an illegal warrant inasmuch as the Court which issued it had no power under law to issue...

Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

authority to impose any punishment/ sentence, which power was only conferred upon the Special Courts or the Ordinary Crminal Courts as the case may be, for prosecution of an offence under the Act. If this is the

Kariyappalada Maddanappa S/O Halappa vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

of Karnataka, THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER Dharwad Bench SECTION 397(1) AND 401 OF CODE OF CRMINAL PROCEDURE1973. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DATED29.08.2018 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT

Ram Babu Gupta and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 154, 155, 156, 156(1), 156(2), 156(3), 173, 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 202(1) and 395; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 156 and 156(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 155

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3363

been expressed as under :-If it was a cognizable offence, he had power under Clause 3, Section 156, Crminal Procedure Code and if it was non-cognizable, he had this power because he was aware that I am