Advanced Search Results

Sanjeev Kumar. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : U.P. Control of Goondas Act - 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 16, 17, 22.

1. Challenge in this petition is to the show cause notice dated 7.4.2010 issued to the petitioner under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act by respondent no. 2 i. e. Addl. District Magistrate, Auraiya.2. From a...

Vijai Singh. Vs.State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : U.P. Control of Goondas Act - Sections 3.

Judgement1. Challenge in this petition is to the show cause notice Annexure 1 to the petition, issued to the petitioner under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act by respondent no. 2 I. e. Addl. District Magistrate,...

Drigpal. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : U.P. Control of Goondas Act - Section 3.

1. Challenge in this petition is to the show cause notice dated 6.3.2010 issued to the petitioner under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act by respondent no. 2 i. e. Addl. District Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai.2....

Musharraf Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 - Section 3, Clauses (a), (b) and(c) of sub-section (1) (3)

1. Heard Sri Manoj Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned AGA appearing for the State respondents and have perused the record. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition...

Rashid Kapadia Vs. Medha Gadgil and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

JUDGMENTChelameswar, J.1. Leave granted.2. Aggrieved by the Judgment in Criminal Writ Petition No.3253 of 2011 of the Bombay High Court, the unsuccessful petitioner therein carried the matter to this Court.3. The said writ petition was filed...

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

Aftab Alam, J.1. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid (hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellant’ or as ‘Kasab’), who is a Pakistani national, has earned for himself five death penalties and an...