Advanced Search Results

Smt Neelaveni a M vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

560001.11. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE 1st FLOOR, BANGALORE 560001.12. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) AND ECONOMIC OFFENCE DIVISION (COD) CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE 560001.13. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE SHANTHINAGAR BMTC … THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTION TO R1 AND 2 ATTACH THE R3, 4, 5 MOVABLE PROPERTY U/S 3 OF KPIDFE ACT 2004 (KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT 2004) AND

Karaniya Vs. State of Rajasthan and Vice Versa

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)478

possession over this field by dispossessing the accused. The accused, therefore, had a right of private defence of property. The learned Sessions Judge again failed to deal with this plea of the accused relating to the right … place, was in his actual physical possession. Now, in a case of fight for possession, the test of criminality is 'was the accused in possession or not at the time when the alleged offence was committed.' Sections

Tekchand Vs. Sabir Husain

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1955CriLJ480

law. In respect of the property in dispute there have been proceedings in the Civil Court, in the Criminal Court and contempt proceedings in the High Court. Bereft of all the complications in the case, what we

Sahayaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Court : Chennai

Police, Thirupparankundram Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai. .... Respondent / Complainant3. Kumaresan .... Respondent / Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 … of relief, arise out of a single and intensely contested dispute concerning possession over an item of immovable property. One petition seeks police protection to enable the petitioner to take possession of the property, while the other

Sasibala G vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADV. G.SUDHEER KARAKKONAM FOR R2 - R4 ADVS. SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN, SRI.R.T.PRADEEP, SRI.V.SURESH, SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:ALEXANDER THOMAS, … by e-mail addressed to District Police Chief, TVM and the competent police official concerned complaining that the residential property belonging to the petitioner herein has been criminally trespassed by contesting respondents 2 to 4..3..herein, and that they

United States Vs. Ursery

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Wren, holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the Government from both punishing a defendant for a criminal offense and forfeiting his property for that same offense in a separate civil proceeding. The courts reasoned in

State by Public Prosecutor Vs. Soundara Pandian and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1979)1MLJ114

ORDERC.J.R. Paul, J.1. This is a petition by the learned Public Prosecutor under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, for quashing the order passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee, dated 19th September, 1977 … to be quashed.4. The main question for determination is whether an offence under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 of which the respondents are accused, is bailable or whether it is non-bailable. The

Dr. P.K. Antia Vs. Dr. Shridhar Sadashiv Katdare and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 350; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145 and 145(1)

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR654; (1982)84BOMLR181; 1982CriLJ1463; 1982MhLJ7

at least Rs. 10,000/-. It is alleged by Dr. Katdare in his application under Section 145 of the Criminal P.C. that there was an explicit under standing that Dr. Deshmukh would remove the X-ray machine and cease … 16) by Hajarnavis and Aggarwal, JJ. for the proposition that the existence of a dispute concerning and immovable property and the likelihood of a breach of the peace were the only two jurisdictional facts which need exist

Dibakar Talukdar and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge.2. The case for the prosecution is that a proceeding under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code was drawn up at the instance of one Mst. Narua Dasya in the court of the … offence of violating an order prohibiting them to do certain thing or take certain order in regard to property. On a perusal of the appellate court's judgment it is clear that the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge

Poresh Nath Sircar Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1906)ILR33Cal295

accused committed a riot '' with the common object of taking possession of some property by means of criminal force, or to enforce a right or supposed right on it.'7. Now the learned pleader for the appellants