Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: criminal property · Page 1 of about 36,546 results (0.055 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1987

Karaniya Vs. State of Rajasthan and Vice Versa

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-08-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)478

possession over this field by dispossessing the accused. The accused, therefore, had a right of private defence of property. The learned Sessions Judge again failed to deal with this plea of the accused relating to the right … place, was in his actual physical possession. Now, in a case of fight for possession, the test of criminality is 'was the accused in possession or not at the time when the alleged offence was committed.' Sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1954

Tekchand Vs. Sabir Husain

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-1954

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1955CriLJ480

law. In respect of the property in dispute there have been proceedings in the Civil Court, in the Criminal Court and contempt proceedings in the High Court. Bereft of all the complications in the case, what we

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1996

United States Vs. Ursery

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-17-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Wren, holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the Government from both punishing a defendant for a criminal offense and forfeiting his property for that same offense in a separate civil proceeding. The courts reasoned in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 1978

State by Public Prosecutor Vs. Soundara Pandian and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-12-1978

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1979)1MLJ114

ORDERC.J.R. Paul, J.1. This is a petition by the learned Public Prosecutor under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, for quashing the order passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Poonamallee, dated 19th September, 1977 … to be quashed.4. The main question for determination is whether an offence under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 of which the respondents are accused, is bailable or whether it is non-bailable. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1981

Dr. P.K. Antia Vs. Dr. Shridhar Sadashiv Katdare and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-20-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 350; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145 and 145(1)

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR654; (1982)84BOMLR181; 1982CriLJ1463; 1982MhLJ7

at least Rs. 10,000/-. It is alleged by Dr. Katdare in his application under Section 145 of the Criminal P.C. that there was an explicit under standing that Dr. Deshmukh would remove the X-ray machine and cease … 16) by Hajarnavis and Aggarwal, JJ. for the proposition that the existence of a dispute concerning and immovable property and the likelihood of a breach of the peace were the only two jurisdictional facts which need exist

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1961

Dibakar Talukdar and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-06-1961

Subject : Criminal

the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge.2. The case for the prosecution is that a proceeding under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code was drawn up at the instance of one Mst. Narua Dasya in the court of the … offence of violating an order prohibiting them to do certain thing or take certain order in regard to property. On a perusal of the appellate court's judgment it is clear that the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1905

Poresh Nath Sircar Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-30-1905

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1906)ILR33Cal295

accused committed a riot '' with the common object of taking possession of some property by means of criminal force, or to enforce a right or supposed right on it.'7. Now the learned pleader for the appellants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2000

Tata Tea Ltd. Vs. Fazlur Rahman

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 630, 630(1) and 630(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 205 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas718(Cal)

and he was allowed to be represented by his learned advocate under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.5. On 12-7-1999, the complaintant/petitioner filed an application in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate praying … of the present petitioner praying for a direction upon the accused to vacate the bungalow which is the property of the petitioner and which the accused opposite party is illegally and wrongfully withholding after the termination of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2015

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-11-2015

Subject : Criminal

(Prayer: Crl. A. No.835/2014 is filed Under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure by the Advocate for the Appellant/Accused No.1 Praying that this Honble Court may be Pleased to set … of his office, been in possession for which the public servant cannot satisfactorily account of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income.” 4. The complainant states that according to the evidence he has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1968

Ram Lakhan Rai Choudhary Vs. Raghunath Choudhary and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-20-1968

Subject : Criminal

This application in revision is directed against an order passed under Section 146 (1B) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Magistrate, First Class, Gauhati, in a Proceeding under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code. The Petitioner … itself was bad and that the Sadar Munsiff was not competent to entertain the reference inasmuch as the property was valued more than the pecuniary jurisdiction of that Court.3. At the outset Mr. Lahiri had to face

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial