Advanced Search Results

Chhaganji Khengarji and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 11, 13, 66(1) and 115-A; ;Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 114

Reported in : AIR1970Guj131; 1970CriLJ956; (1970)0GLR573

arise in all these three revision petitions and hence, they are being disposed of by this judgment.2. In Criminal Revision Application No. 464 of 1966, petitioner Chhaganji was prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(b) … found drunk near the hospital in a public place in Deesa town, district Banaskantha and he had also consumed liquor without a pass or permit. Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mr. N. G. Butala, in that Criminal

State of Haryana Vs. Krishan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.847 OF2006STATE OF HARYANA .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KRISHAN & ANR. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.In … poison. They also had a definite knowledge that sale of such liquor would cause methanol poisoning to the consumers and the possible result would be death or bodily injury. On this basis, invoking the provisions of Section

Shukla Dutta Roy, Rep. by Power of Agent Biplab Dutta Roy Vs. V. Moham ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 138 and 139; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 309

R. Mala, J.1. The Criminal Appeals have been filed by the complainants against the judgments of acquittal, dated 13.11.2002 and 5.1.2006 in C.C. … Since there was defect in service, the appellants-complainants have filed O.P. No. 32 of 1998 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai, wherein, a joint memo was filed on 24.11.1998 and in pursuance of the same,

T. Swamydoss Vs. Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the prisoner from the hospital. But, in the instant case, the petitioner has allowed a hard core criminal to escape from his custody which is a serious delinquency. Hence, the earlier case is entirely different from … connived with his guard Commander Raj, Police Constable 8708 and taken a detenu, to his house and both consumed liquor at his residence and also received an illegal gratification of Rs.300/- for letting out the detenu from

Babbitt Vs. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

election of employee bargaining representatives; (2) limiting union publicity directed at consumers of agricultural products; (3) imposing a criminal penalty for violations of the statute; (4) excusing an agricultural employer from furnishing a union any materials, information, … the provisions (1) specifying procedures for the election of employee bargaining representatives; (2) limiting union publicity directed at consumers of agricultural products; (3) imposing a criminal penalty for violations of the statute; (4) excusing an agricultural employer

Freeman Vs. Quicken Loans, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

strong indication that something in petitioners’ interpretation is amiss.      At any rate, §2607(b) is also enforceable through criminal prosecutions, §2607(d)(1), and actions for injunctive relief brought by federal and state regulators, §2607(d)(4). HUD’s 2001 policy statement … (1) Section 2607(b) clearly describes two distinct exchanges. First, a “charge” is “made” to or “received” from a consumer by a settlement-service provider. That provider then “give[s],” and another person “accept[s],” a “portion, split, or percentage” of

Ram Chander Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 39, 44 and 50; Indian Electricity Rules - Rules 56 and 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 417; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1967SC349; 1966(0)BLJR920; 1967CriLJ409; [1966]3SCR517

23, 1963 the High Court at Patna decided four appeals preferred by the State of Bihar and two criminal revision petitions, one on behalf of the complainant and another on behalf of an accused person. These appeals … the courts are concurrent in holding that the appellant was running the mills and that he was a consumer as defined in Section 2(c) of the Act. Moreover, his convictions under Section 44(c) and under r. 138

Om Parkash Babbar Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : (2003)133PLR176

Viney Mittal, J. 1. The present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to the 'Code') for quashing of an FIR registered under Section 379 of the Indian … there was a policy of the Board to the effect that once a penalty was imposed on the consumer with regard to the theft of the electricity, then the aforesaid FIR was to be withdrawn and connection

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

against the final judgment and order dated 10.02.2012 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of … the knowledge that on consumption of the same, it can cause death or severe physical damage/injury to the consumer.7) When the accused/appellant moved an application under Section 439 of the Code in connection with C.R. No. 252

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.334 OF 201.2 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No 3334 of 2012) Ravindersingh … the knowledge that on consumption of the same, it can cause death or severe physical damage/injury to the consumer. 7) When the accused/appellant moved an application under Section 439 of the Code in connection with C.R. No.252